Formation of the Mechanism of Stimulation of Innovating Activity of Industrial Enterprises

Currently Russian industrial enterprises operate in the conditions of global competition at the world market. That’s why creating conditions and implementing a number of activities aimed at stimulation of progressive structural changes in production, meeting the world standards, is a key direction of the policy regarding industrial enterprises. According to the authors, achievement of the objective is possible via activation of innovating activity at enterprises, including industrial ones. The goal of the scientific article is the development and justification of the efficiency of the mechanism of stimulation of innovative activity of the industrial enterprises. Innovative and investment processes of the industrial enterprises are the target of the research. A complex approach to the study of business events in the field of innovative activity of the industrial enterprises is the methodological basis of the scientific article. Scientific novelty of the research lies in theoretical justification and development of the methodological approaches to the formation of innovating activity of the industrial enterprises in the modern period. The authors developed the mechanism of stimulation of innovative activity of the industrial enterprises, facilitating activation and development of innovations. The forms of interaction of the enterprises were revealed; they increase the efficiency of the structure of management of innovative activity. A matrix was developed, making it possible to evaluate the practicality and efficiency of the inter­action of the social forms of organizations on the basis of positive and negative factors. Thus, the efficiency of the developed mechanism of stimulation of innovative activity of the industrial enterprises, capable of multiplying their innovative potential and redefining the innovatively active industrial enterprises, was justified and proved.

1. Dolzhenko R.A. Ispol’zovanie kraudsorsinga kak istochnika innovacij i idej v organizacii // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2015. № 1. P 224-237

2. Ruban D.A. Upravlenie innovacionnymi sistemami i investicionnaja sreda regionov // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2016. № 2. P 82-95.

3. Serga L.K., Simonova E.Ju., Zajkov K.A. Metodicheskij podhod k modelirovaniju jekonomicheskogo rosta innovacionnoj jekonomiki regiona // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2016. № 4. P 301-314.

4. Shumpeter J. Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija. M.: Progress, 1982. 456 p.

5. Arvanitis R., Villavicencio D. (2000). Learning and innovation in the chemical industry in Mexico. In Developing innovation systems: Mexico in a Global Context, M. Cimoli (Ed). London, Pinter: 189-205.

6. Autant-Bernard C., Fadairo M., Massard N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy 1: 196-210.

7. Becker W, Dietz J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firmsevidence for the German industry. Research Policy 33: p. 209-223.

8. Coad A., Rao R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research policy 37: p. 633-648.

9. Fagerberg J. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford university press, 2005.

10. Freel M. (2006). Patterns of technological innovation in knowledge-intensive business services. Industry & Innovation 13, no. 3: p. 335-58.

11. Frenkel A. (2003). Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region. European Planning Studies, 11, p. 115-137

12. Galende J., De la Fuente J.M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy 32 (5), p. 715-736.

13. Guan J.C., Yam R.C.M. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy 44: p. 273-282.

14. Hadhri W., Arvanitis R., M’henni H. (2016). Determinants of Innovation Activities in Small and Open Economies: The Lebanese Business Sector. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 321, p. 77-107

15. Hansen T., Winter L. (2011). Innovation, regional development and relations between high-and low-tech industries. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18, 3: p. 321-339.

16. LoukilK. (2016). Foreign direct investment and technological innovation in developing countries. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), p. 31-40.

17. Veselovsky M.Y., Khoroshavina N.S., Bank O.A., Suglobov A.E., Khmelev S.A. Characteristics of the Innovation Development of Russia’s Industrial Enterprises under Conditions of Economic Sanctions // Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. 2017 Vol. XII. Iss. 2 (48). P 321-331.

18. Nelson R.R., Nelson K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy 31, no. 2: p. 265-72.

19. Segarra A., Arauzo J.M. Innovation and productivity in manufacturing and service firms in Catalonia: a regional approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2010. Vol. 19, № 3. P 233-258.

20. Stieglitz N., Heine K. (2007). Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 28, no. 1: p. 1-15.

21. Storey D.J., Tether B.S. (1998). Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union. Research policy 9: p. 1037-1057

22. Stuart T.E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic management journal 21: p. 791-811.

23. Andergassen R., Nardini F., & Ricottilli M. (2009). Innovation and growth through local and global interaction. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 33, 1779-1795. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2009.04.003.

24. Epstein M.J., Davila T., Matusik S. (2004). Innovation strategy and the use of performance measures. Advances in Management Accounting, 13, p. 27-58. Doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7871 (04)13002-5.