Monoprofile Municipal formation (Monocity): specifics of the russian and foreign conceptual framework
Abstract
The article studies and discusses the issue of absence of clear definition of the ‘monocity’ category in the normative legal base in the conditions of fairly commonness of monocities in the Russian Federation. Modern scientific approaches to the definition of ‘monocity’ are analyzed, its essential characteristics are considered. Synonymic categories used in Russia and abroad are presented. No generally accepted approaches to the definition were revealed, however the main elements of the definition were marked out. A universal interpretation of the concept of monoprofile municipal formation (monocity) was formed on the basis of the research; the main signs of monocity were marked out.
About the Author
S. V. Kulay
Prokopievsk branch of T.F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University
Russian Federation
Kulay Svetlana V.,Senior Lecturer, Department of Natural Sciences and Economics, Prokopievsk branch
Russian Federation
Kulay Svetlana V.,Senior Lecturer, Department of Natural Sciences and Economics, Prokopievsk branch
References
1. Agranat G.A. Vozmozhnosti i real’nosti osvoenija severa: global’nye uroki. M.: Viniti, 1992. 162 p.
2. Alaev Je.B. Jeffektivnost’ kompleksnogo razvitija jekonomicheskogo rajona. M.: nauka,1965. P. 112.
3. Animica E.G., Medvedeva I.A., Suhih V.A. Malye i srednie goroda: nauchno-teoreticheskie aspekty issledovanija: Monografija / ural.gos. jekon. un-t. ekaterinburg, 2003.
4. Animica E.G., Bochko V.S., Peshina Je.V., Animica P.E. Konceptual’nye podhody k razrabotke strategii razvitija monopro-fil’nogo goroda / pod red. a.i. tatarkina, M.V.fedorova. ekaterinburg: urgJeu, 2010. 81 p.
5. Bandman M.K., Larina N.I., Cherevikina M.Ju. i dr. territorial’no-proizvodstvennye kompleksy: planirovanie i upravlenie / otv. red. a.g. aganbe-gjan; iJeoPP so an sssr. novosibirsk: nauka. sib. otd-nie, 1984. 246 p.
6. Veber M. istorija hozjajstva. gorod / per. s nem.; pod red. i. grevsa; komment. n.sarkitova, g. Kuchkova. M.: «Kanon-press-c», «Kuchkovo pole», 2001. 576 p.
7. Granberg A.G. osnovy regional’noj jekonomiki. M.: guVshJe, 2001. 495 p.
8. Gureeva M.A. Jekonomicheskie problemy monogorodov v uslovijah mirovogo finansovogo krizisa // Vestnik rossijskogo novogo universiteta. 2011. P. 37–45.
9. Kolosovskij N.N. teorija jekonomicheskogo rajonirovanija. M.: Mysl’, 1969. P. 142–143.
10. Konovalova T.A. Monopromyshlennye goroda strategicheskogo znachenija: tipy i osobennosti funkcionirovanija // Molodoj uchenyj. 2013. № 3. P. 234–239.
11. Konceptual’nye podhody k razrabotke strategii razvitija monoprofil’nogo goroda / e.g.animica (ruk. avt. koll.), V.s. Bochko, Je.V. Peshina, P.e.animica; pod nauch. red. a.i.tatarkina, M.V.fjodorova; ural. gos. jekon. un-t, in-t jekonomiki uro ran. ekaterinburg: izd-vo urgJeu, 2010. 81 p.
12. Kuznecova G.Ju. geograficheskoe issledovanie monoprofil’nyh poselenij rossii: dis. ... kand. geogr. nauk: 25.00.24. M., 2003. 260 p.
13. Maslova A.N. Jekonomicheskaja baza monopromyshlennyh gorodov: osobennosti, konkurentosposobnost’, potencial // Mezhdunarodnaja internet-konferencija «aktual’nye voprosy sovremennoj nauki»: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. M.: izdatel’stvo «sputnik+», 2008. P. 160–164.
14. Monoprofil’nye goroda i gradoobrazujushhie predprijatija / Proekt Jekspertnogo instituta. M.: izd-vo informacionnogo press-centra «Jekspertiza», 1999. P. 48.
15. Monoprofil’nye goroda i gradoobrazujushhie predprijatija: baza dannyh o gradoobrazujushhih predprijatijah i monogorodah rossii / pod red. kand. jekon. nauk i.V. Lipsica. M.: izdatel’skij dom Hroniker, 2000. P. 254–262.
16. obshhaja metodika razrabotki general’noj shemy razvitija i razmeshhenija proizvoditel’nyh sil sssrna 1971–1980 gg. M.: Jekonomika, 1966. 83 p.
17. Percik E.N. geografija gorodov (geourbanistika). M., 1991. 319 p.
18. Petrikova E.M. Kompleksnaja investicionnaja programma monogoroda // territorija i planirovanie. 2011. № 2 (32). P. 80–89.
19. razvitie monogorodov rossii: monografija / koll. avt. pod red. d-ra jekon. nauk, prof. i.n.il’inoj. M.: finansovyj universitet, 2013. 168 p.
20. Rastvorceva S.N., Manaeva I.V. social’no-jekonomicheskoe razvitie monogorodov central’no-chernozemnogo rajona rossii: problemy i puti reshenija: Monografija. M.: Jekon-inform, 2013. 140 p.
21. Saushkin Ju.G. Kompleksnoe razvitie narodnogo hozjajstva sssr. M., 1966.
22. Tereshhenko O.V. Potencial gorodov (Metody strategicheskogo izuchenija). novosibirsk: izd-vo novosib. un-ta, 1991. 176 p.
23. Turgel’ I.D. Monofunkcional’nye goroda rossii: ot vyzhivanija k ustojchivomu razvitiju. ekaterinburg: rossijskaja akad. gos. sluzhby pri Prezidente rossijskoj federacii, ural’skaja akad. gos. sluzhby, 2010. 519 p.
24. Sharygin M.D. drobnoe jekonomicheskoe rajonirovanie i lokal’nye territorial’noproizvodstvennye kompleksy: kurs lekcij. Perm’, 1975.
25. Barry Levy. town born: the political economy of new england from its founding to the revolution. 2009. 354 p.
26. Carlson L. company towns of the Pacific northwest. university of Washington Press, 2003. 286 р.
27. crabb tony company town syndrome australian cPa// Proquestabl. 2002. № 8. 28 p.
28. Dale B. an institutional approach to local restructuring – the case of four norwegian mining towns european urban and regional studies. 2002. 9 (1). P. 5–20.
29. Ehsani K. social engineering and the contradictions of modernization in Khuzestan’s company tows: a look at abadan and Masjed-soleyman, international review of social History. 2003. № 3. P. 361–399.
30. John S. garner the company town: architecture and society in the early industrial age. 1992. 245 р.
31. Leadbeater D. Mining towns and the new Hinterlend crisis, canadian dimension, dimension Publications inc. 2004. № 5. P. 41–44.
32. Mary Louise McAllister. governing ourselves?: the politics of canadian communities. 2004. 333 p.
33. Nel E.L., Christian M.R.Local economic development in the developing world: the experience of southern africa. 2005. 352 p.
34. Oliver J. Dinius, Angela Vergara. company towns in the americas: Landscape, Power, and Working-class communities. 2011. 236 p.
35. Lappo G.P. Zakrytye goroda. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. urL: http://www.xserver.ru/user/zakrg/ (data obrashhenija: 08.02.2019).
36. tolkovyj slovar’ ushakova. d.n. ushakov. 1935–1940. [Jelektronnyj resurs] akademik. urL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ushakov/863030 (data obrashhenija: 04.04.2018).
37. Turgel’ I.D. fenomen gorodskoj monospecializacii: soderzhanie, genezis, tendencii razvitija // chinovnik. 2003. № 1 (23). [Jelektronnyj resurs]. urL: http://chinovnik.uapa.ru/ru/issue/2003/01/04/ (data obrashhenija: 04.01.2019).
38. internet-resurs cyclowiki. urL: http://cyclowiki.org/wiki/Monogorod (data obrashhenija: 15.08.2017).
39. oficial’nyj sajt sojuza rossijskih gorodov. urL: http://urc.ru/index.php?page=35 (data obrashhenija: 28.04.2016).
40. sajt analiticheskogo agentstva rWay rossija. urL: http://rway.ru/russia/articles/39/ (data obrashhenija: 25.03.2017).
Review
For citations:
Kulay S.V. Monoprofile Municipal formation (Monocity): specifics of the russian and foreign conceptual framework. Vestnik NSUEM. 2019;(1):262-274. (In Russ.)
Email this article 
