Preview

Vestnik NSUEM

Advanced search

Problems in the Assessment of Large-Scale Projects

https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-4-026-040

Abstract

This paper analyzes problems revealed by practice of implementation of large-scale projects (megaprojects). It discusses features of large-scale projects, namely, their impact on the whole economy and high uncertainty regarding conditions of their implementation, as well as possibilities of the standard approach to assessing social efficiency of investment projects to adequately take account of these features. Some ways to solve the problems under consideration are proposed.

About the Author

K. P. Gluschenko
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the RAS, Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Gluschenko Konstantin P., Doctor of Economics, Professor


References

1. Babun R.V. Razvitie chernoj metallurgii Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka: Narodnohozjajstvennyj aspekt. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1987.

2. Bogachjov V.N. Regiony Rossii: teorija, problemy Sibiri, jekonomika stroitel’stva. Novosibirsk: IJeiOPP SO RAN, 1999.

3. Glushhenko K.P. Ocenka obshhestvennoj jeffektivnosti investicionnyh proektov // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2019. № 3. P. 10–27.

4. Granberg A.G. Mezhotraslevye modeli optimal’nogo razmeshhenija proizvoditel’nyh sil SSSR // Modeli i metody optimal’nogo razvitija i razmeshhenija proizvodstva. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 1965. P. 139–186.

5. Granberg A.G., Suslov V.I., Suspicyn S.A. Mnogoregional’nye sistemy: jekonomikomatematicheskoe issledovanie. Novosibirsk: Sibirskoe nauchnoe izdatel’stvo, 2007.

6. Gulakova O.I., Ershov Ju.S., Ibragimov N.M., Novikova T.S. Ocenka obshhestvennoj jeffektivnosti infrastrukturnogo proekta na primere nefteprovoda «Vostochnaja Sibir’ – Tihij okean»-2 // Region: jekonomika i sociologija. 2017. № 2. P. 126–151.

7. Djupjui Zh. O mere poleznosti grazhdanskih sooruzhenij // Vehi jekonomicheskoj mysli. T. 1. Teorija potrebitel’skogo sprosa. SPb.: Jekonomicheskaja shkola, 2000. P. 28–36.

8. Ershov V.F. Biznes-proektirovanie. SPb.: Piter, 2005.

9. Istomin V. Alihanstroj // Nasha versija. 2019. № 20. P. 16.

10. Kibalov E.B., Bespalov I.A., Buzuluckov V.F. i dr. Kompleksnyj podhod k ocenke obshhestvennoj jeffektivnosti krupnomasshtabnyh zheleznodorozhnyh proektov. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SGUPSa, 2015.

11. Kozhevnikov R.A., Baharev E.V., Shipovskaja N.I., Kozhevnikov G.I. Jekonomicheskoe obosnovanie proektnogo upravlenija investicionnoj dejatel’nosti na zheleznodorozhnom transporte. M.: Izvestija, 2018.

12. Kononov Ju.D., Krivoruckij L.D., Makarova A.S.Optimizacija dolgosrochnogo razvitija toplivno-jenergeticheskogo kompleksa v uslovijah neopredelennosti // Metody analiza i modeli struktury territorial’no-proizvodstvennyh kompleksov. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1979. P. 31–46.

13. Modelirovanie vzaimodejstvija mnogootraslevyh kompleksov v sisteme narodnogo hozjajstva. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1992.

14. Optimizacionnye mezhregional’nye mezhotraslevye modeli. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1989.

15. Optimizacija territorial’nyh sistem. Novosibirsk: IJeOPP SO RAN, 2010.

16. Ocenka krupnyh infrastrukturnyh proektov. Zadachi i reshenija. M.: Fond «Centr strategicheskih razrabotok», 2013.

17. Region BAM: koncepcija razvitija na novom jetape. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo SO RAN, 1996.

18. Serikov P.Ju., Korneeva S.V., Petrova Ju.A. Ocenka investicionnyh proektov s tochki zrenija obshhestvennoj jeffektivnosti s uchetom mul’tiplikativnyh jeffektov // Nauka i tehnologii truboprovodnogo transporta nefti i nefteproduktov. 2014. № 3. P. 108–115.

19. Suslov V.I. Izmerenie jeffektov mezhregional’nyh vzaimodejstvij: modeli, metody, rezul’taty. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1991.

20. Territorial’no-proizvodstvennye kompleksy: Predplanovye issledovanija. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1988.

21. Tipovaja metodika opredelenija jekonomicheskoj jeffektivnosti kapital’nyh vlozhenij i novoj tehniki v narodnom hozjajstve SSSR. M.: Gosplanizdat, 1960.

22. Transportnaja strategija Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2030 goda // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii. 2008. № 50. St. 5977.

23. Flivb’org B., Bruzelis N., Rotengatter V. Megaproekty i riski. Anatomija ambicij. M.: Al’pina Pablisher, 2014.

24. Fomin D.A. Ocenka nacional’nogo bogatstva: sovetskaja istorija i postsovetskaja praktika // JeKO. 2019. № 8. P. 141–162.

25. Bröcker J., Mercenier J. General equilibrium models for transportation economics // A handbook of transport economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. P. 21–45.

26. Flyvbjerg B. What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview // Project Management Journal. 2014.Vol. 45. № 2. P. 6–19.

27. Flyvbjerg B., Glenting C., Rønnest A.K. Procedures for dealing with optimism bias in transport planning: Guidance document. London: UK Department for Transport, 2004.

28. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M.K.S., Buhl S.L. How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? // Transport Reviews. 2003.Vol. 23. № 1. P. 71–88.

29. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M.K.S., Buhl S.L. How (in)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation // Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005.Vol. 71. № 2. P. 131–146.

30. Kolik A., Radziwill A., Turdyeva N. Improving transport infrastructure in Russia // OECD Economics Department Working Papers. № 1193. Paris: OECD, 2015.

31. Proost S., Dunkerley F., Van der Loo S., Adler N., Bröcker J., Korzhenevych A. Do the selected Trans European transport investments pass the cost benefit test? // Transportation. 2014.Vol. 41. № 1. P. 107–132.

32. Scitovszky T. A note on welfare propositions in economics // Review of Economic Studies. 1941.Vol. 9. № 1. P. 77–88.

33. Wegener M. SASI Model Description. Working Paper No. 08/01. Dortmund: Spiekermann & Wegener Urban and Regional Research, 2008.

34. Bröcker J., Kancs A., Schürmann C., Wegener M. Methodology for the assessment of spatial economic impacts of transport projects and policies. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung No. 54. Kiel and Dortmund: Institut für Raumplanung, 2002. [Jelektronnyj resurs] Rezhim dostupa: https://eldorado.tu-dortmund.de/bitstream/ 2003/26581/1/54.pdf (data obrashhenija: 6.05.2019).

35. Developing harmonised European approaches for transport costing and project assessment. Deliverable 1. Current practice in project appraisal in Europe. European Commission EC-DG TREN, 2005. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https:// trimis.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/project/documents/20130122_113558_74349_ hd1final.pdf (data obrashhenija: 5.05.2019).

36. Facts and furphies in benefit-cost analysis: transport. Canberra: Bureau of Transport Economics, 1999. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.bitre.gov.au/ publications/1999/files/report_100.pdf (data obrashhenija: 11.07.2019).

37. Improved decision aid methods and tools to support evaluation of investment for transport and energy networks in Europe. Deliverable 1. Evaluating the state-ofthe-art in investment for transport and energy networks. EVA-TREN, 2008. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://trimis.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/project/ documents/20121215_150641_58200_Deliverable_1.pdf (data obrashhenija: 4.07.2019).

38. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGCU-ncr03I (data obrashhenija: 11.07.2019).


Review

For citations:


Gluschenko K.P. Problems in the Assessment of Large-Scale Projects. Vestnik NSUEM. 2019;(4):26-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-4-026-040



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6495 (Print)