Incidence of Socially Significant Diseases in the Context of Studying the Demographic Security of the Country
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-4-208-219
Abstract
The article reflects the problems of solving theoretical and methodological issues of the statistical research of demographic security. In order to justify the system of statistical indicators of the demographic security, considered regional differences in the incidence of socially significant diseases:tuberculosis, HIV infections, malignant neoplasms, mental disorders, psychotic disorders associated with alcohol use and alcohol dependence syndrome, syphilis. Groups of subjects of the Russian Federation with the maximum and minimum values of indicators are allocated and shown on the map. The most socially prosperous regions in Russia are the Republic of Dagestan, the Chechen Republic, the Republic of Kalmykia, the Republic of Ingushetia and the Belgorod region, the Irkutsk region and the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug were the absolute Champions in terms of social disadvantage in 2018.
About the Authors
N. I. Ovechkina
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Ovechkina Nataliya I., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Statistics
Russian Federation
Ovechkina Nataliya I., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Statistics
E. S. Shmarikhina
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Shmarikhina Elena S., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Statistics
Russian Federation
Shmarikhina Elena S., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Statistics
References
1. Voroncov T.N., Tjukov Ju.A., Voroncova I.Z. Zabolevaemost’, invalidnost’ i smertnost’ naselenija pri social’no znachimyh zabolevanijah // Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Ural’skij region. 2012. № 2. P. 141–148.
2. Glinskij V.V., Ovechkina N.I., Shmarihina E.S. Ob upravlenii jeffektivnost’ju nesploshnyh nabljudenij.Opytsociologicheskih issledovanij //Idei i idealy. 2012.№ 4 (14). P. 124–135.
3. Marhaev A.G., Badleeva M.V., Ubeeva I.P., Gonchikova S.Ch. Zabolevaemost’ tuberkulezom korennogo naselenija Respubliki Burjatija // Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. № 12. P. 131–134.
4. Ovechkina N.I. K voprosu o smertnosti naselenija Rossii // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2018. № 1. P. 93–102.
5. Ovechkina N.I. Smertnost’ naselenija Rossii: regional’nyj aspekt // Mogushhestvo Sibiri budet prirastat’!? // Sb. dokl. mezhdunar. nauch. foruma «Obrazovanie i predprinimatel’stvo v Sibiri: napravlenija vzaimodejstvija i razvitie regionov»: v 4-h t. / Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet jekonomiki i upravlenija. Novosibirsk, 2018. P. 131–137.
6. Ovechkina N.I. Jetnicheskij i religioznyj aspekty razvitija chelovechestva // Idei i idealy. 2015.T. 2. № 4 (26). P. 107–116.
7. Ovechkina N.I., Shmarihina E.S. K voprosu o demograficheskoj bezopasnosti Rossii // Modelirovanie razvitija social’no-jekonomicheskogo potenciala territorii v uslovijah sovremennyh vyzovov: mat-ly mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. / Vostochno-Sibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet tehnologij i upravlenija. Ulan-Udje, 2018. P. 188–194.
8. Ovechkina N.I., Shmarihina E.S. Problemy statisticheskogo nabljudenija pri issledovanii demograficheskoj bezopasnosti // Vestnik kafedry statistiki Rossijskogo jekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plehanova: mat-ly i dokl. / pod obshh. red. N.A. Sadovnikovoj. M., 2017. P. 207–209.
9. Rybakovskij L.L. Demograficheskaja bezopasnost’: geopoliticheskie aspekty // Narodonaselenie. 2004. № 1. P. 22–346.
10. Semenova N.V., Neznanov N.G. Dinamika obshhej i pervichnoj zabolevaemosti psihicheskimi rasstrojstvami naselenija Leningradskoj oblasti v 2000–2009 gg. // Rossijskij psihiatricheskij zhurnal. 2010. № 5. P. 29–33.
11. Smelov P.A., Karmanov M.V., Romanov A.A. K voprosu o teoreticheskih podhodah k ocenke demograficheskoj bezopasnosti // Statistika i matematicheskie metody v jekonomike. 2015. № 4. P. 164–169.
12. Stekol’shhikov L.V. Zabolevaemost’ naselenija trudosposobnogo vozrasta social’no znachimymi boleznjami //Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. I.Ja. Jakovleva. 2013. № 2 (78). P. 146–149.
13. Tihomirova T.M., Gordeeva V.I. Sopostavitel’nyj analiz territorij RF po zabolevaemosti naselenija razlichnymi formami zlokachestvennyh novoobrazovanij // Jekonomika prirodopol’zovanija. 2013. № 2. P. 108–125.
14. Shahot’ko L.P., Privalova N.N. Demograficheskaja bezopasnost’: sushhnost’, zadachi, sistema pokazatelej i mehanizm realizacii // Voprosy statistiki. 2001. № 7. P. 16–21.
15. Shitov A.V. Rol’ geologicheskih faktorov v izmenenii zabolevaemosti naselenija Respubliki Altaj // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. № 332. P. 192–196.
16. Jepshtejn N.D., Karmanov M.V., Vasil’eva A.V. Problemy integral’noj ocenki i obespechenija demograficheskoj bezopasnosti // Statistika i matematicheskie metody v jekonomike. 2015. № 3. P. 233–237.
17. Social’no znachimye zabolevanija naselenija Rossii v 2018 godu (Statisticheskie materialy). URL: https://www.rosminzdrav.ru/ministry/61/22/stranitsa-979/statisticheskie-iinformatsionnye-materialy/statisticheskiy-sbornik-2018-god (data obrashhenija: 31.10. 2019).
18. Kostrova N.A.K voprosu o ponjatii «demograficheskaja bezopasnost’» // Estestvennye i tehnicheskie nauki. 2007. URL: http://naukarus.com/k-voprosu-o-ponyatii-demografi cheskaya-bezopasnost (data obrashhenija: 31.10.2019).
Review
For citations:
Ovechkina N.I., Shmarikhina E.S. Incidence of Socially Significant Diseases in the Context of Studying the Demographic Security of the Country. Vestnik NSUEM. 2019;(4):208-219. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-4-208-219
Email this article 
