Preview

Vestnik NSUEM

Advanced search

Basic Models of Economic Systems Behavior in the Risk – Income Dimension

https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-4-304-319

Abstract

The institutionalization of public and private interests forms the framework for the functioning of economic systems and intersystem interactions. The indicated interactions are considered in the paradigm «subject – polysubjective environment».The main mechanisms coordinating economic adaptation interactions are hierarchies and market organizations. The existing theoretical ideas about the economic organization of environments on the basis of an institutional approach to resolving the existing contradiction between public and private encounter a number of problems associated with the insufficient study of issues of group and intergroup interaction in a polysubjective environment and the assessment of the corresponding economic effect. The article considers the development of the concept of robust management based on the universal laws of evolutionary development of economic organizations. Studies are aimed at revealing other forms of economic organization and the evolutionary nature of interactions in the process of transitions from one economic organization to another. The proposed «polysubjects – polysubjective environment» paradigm takes into account and reflects the behavior of market participants in intersystem interaction and the emergence of intra- and intergroup reflexive processes, which fundamentally distinguishes it from the existing «subject – polysubjective environment» paradigm. Accordingly, problems related to the inaccessibility of confidential information related to the activities of groups, where analysis must be carried out on the basis of publicly available information, require resolution. The necessity of developing a methodological approach to the analysis of group and intergroup interaction in a polysubjective environment and the corresponding methodological tools is substantiated.The evolutionary nature of interactions in the context of a «polysubjects – polysubjective environment» is determined by a model aimed at the analytical study of the relationships of a polysubject and a polysubjective environment, based on ideas about robust stability, in the form of specific mathematical dependencies and relationships that are subject to additional analytical research. Within the framework of the model approach, conclusions are expected to be consistent with the empirical facts of the functioning of economic subject – polysubjects in conjunction with a polysubjective environment.

About the Authors

P. N. Likhutin
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Likhutin Pavel N., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Corporate Governance and Finance


M. A. Alekseev
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Alekseev Mikhail A., Doctor of Economics, Head of the Department of Corporate Governance and Finance


References

1. Alekseev M.A., Lihutin P.N., Dudin S.A. Teoreticheskie podhody k ponimaniju vzaimosvjazej mezhdu informaciej,neopredelennost’ju i povedeniem jekonomicheskih sub#ektov // Integracija nauki i obshhestva na sovremennom jetape: sb. mat-lov V Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Novosibirsk, 28–29 nojabrja 2018 g.) / otv. red. L.K. Bobrov; Novosib. gos. un-t jekonomiki i upravlenija. Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2018. 564 p.

2. Vejsman A. Lekcii po jevoljucionnoj teorii / per. s nem. V. Elpat’evskogo i G. Rittera; pod red.V.N. L’vova. Ch. 1. M.: M. i S. Sabashnikovy, 1905. 505 p.

3. Vol’chik V.V. Jevoljucija institutov postindustrial’noj jekonomiki v kontekste dihotomii Veblena // Jekonomicheskij vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008.T. 6. № 2. P. 53–64.

4. Darvin Ch. Proishozhdenie vidov / per. s angl. K.A. Timirjazeva; pod red. F.A. Dvorjankina. M.: Sel’hozgiz, 1952. 484 p.

5. Knjazeva E.N., Kurkina E.S. Priroda slozhnosti: metodologicheskie sledstvija matematicheskogo modelirovanija jevoljucii slozhnyh struktur // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. «Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti». M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. 496 p.

6. Korogodin V.I., Korogodina V.L. Informacija kak osnova zhizni. Dubna: Feniks, 2000. 208 p.

7. Lamark Zh.B. Filosofija zoologii / per. s fr. S.V. Sapozhnikova. T. 1. M.; L.: Biomedgiz, 1935. 330 p.;T. 2. M.; L.: Biomedgiz, 1937. 483 p.

8. Lepskij V.E.Mehanizmy samoregulirovanija slozhnost’ju v refleksivno-aktivnyh sredah innovacionnogo razvitija // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. «Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti». M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. 496 p.

9. Lepskij V.E. Jevoljucija predstavlenij ob upravlenii (metodologicheskij i filosofskij analiz). M.: Kogito-Centr, 2015. 107 p.

10. Lefevr V.A. Algebra sovesti. M.: Kogito-Centr, 2003. 426 p.

11. Nel’son R., Uinter S. Jevoljucionnaja teorija jekonomicheskih izmenenij / per. s angl. M.Ja. Kazhdan; Akademija narodnogo hozjajstva pri Pravitel’stve RF. M.: Delo, 2002. 536 p.

12. Nort D., Uollis Dzh., Vajngast B. Nasilie i social’nye porjadki. Konceptual’nye ramki dlja interpretacii pis’mennoj istorii chelovechestva. M.: Izd. Instituta Gajdara, 2011. 480 p.

13. Olson M. Logika kollektivnyh dejstvij: Obshhestvennye blaga i teorija grupp / per. s angl. M.: Fond Jekonomicheskoj Iniciativy, 1995. 165 p.

14. Ouchi Uil’jam G. Metody organizacii proizvodstva: japonskij i amerikanskij podhody / per. s angl. M.: Jekonomika. 1984. 184 p.

15. Rautian A.S. Buket zakonov jevoljucii // Jevoljucija biosfery i bioraznoobrazija. K 70-letiju A.Ju. Rozanova. M.: KMK, 2006. P. 20–38.

16. Robastnaja ustojchivost’ jekonomicheskih sistem: monografija / M.A. Alekseev i dr.; nauch. red. M.A. Alekseev; Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet jekonomiki i upravlenija. Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2018. 276 p.

17. Uil’jamson O. Jekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaja» kontraktacija / per. s angl. SPb.: Lenizdat; CEV Press, 1996. 702 p.

18. Shumpeter J.A.Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija. M.: Direktmedia Pablishing, 2008. 401 p.

19. Clements F.E. Plant succession // Washington, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1916. P. 3.

20. Grossman S.J., Stiglitz J.E. On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets // American Economic Review. 1980. № 70. P. 393–408.

21. Hayek F.The use of knowledge in society // American Economic Review. 1945.Vol. 35. September. P. 5J9–530.

22. Ouchi W.G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1980b.Vol. 25. March. P. 120–142.

23. Oficial’nyj sajt Nobelevskogo komiteta. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www. nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2007/summary/ (data obrashhenija: 20.10. 2019).

24. Oficial’nyj sajt Nobelevskogo komiteta. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www. nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2008/summary/ (data obrashhenija: 20.10. 2019).

25. Oficial’nyj sajt Nobelevskogo komiteta. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www. nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/summary/ (data obrashhenija: 20.10. 2019).

26. Oficial’nyj sajt Nobelevskogo komiteta. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www. nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2012/summary/ (data obrashhenija: 20.10. 2019).

27. Oficial’nyj sajt Nobelevskogo komiteta. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www. nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2014/summary/ (data obrashhenija: 20.10. 2019).

28. Oficial’nyj sajt Nobelevskogo komiteta. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www. nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2017/summary/ (data obrashhenija: 20.10. 2019).


Review

For citations:


Likhutin P.N., Alekseev M.A. Basic Models of Economic Systems Behavior in the Risk – Income Dimension. Vestnik NSUEM. 2019;(4):304-319. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-4-304-319



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6495 (Print)