Theoretical Concepts of Risk in Social and Humanitarian Knowledge
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2020-1-203-218
Abstract
The article considers the main approaches to risk research, which is a constant companion of human activity. It is shown that the process of forming the theoretical bases of risk occurred over a long period of time in all areas of social, humanitarian and natural knowledge, which led to the emergence of various risk-based concepts. The dynamics of the attitude to risk in different periods of human history is presented, which resulted in the emergence of a modern «risk society», in which risk is perceived as the reverse side of progress.
About the Author
Z. E. Tuzhba
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Tuzhba Zakhar E., Postgraduate
Russian Federation
Tuzhba Zakhar E., Postgraduate
References
1. Al’gin A.P. Risk i ego rol’ v obshhestvennoj zhizni. M.: Mysl’, 1989. 188 p.
2. Bykov A.A., Porfir’ev B.N. Ob analize riska, koncepcijah i klassifikacii riskov // Problemy analiza riska. 2006. № 4. P. 319–337.
3. Bek U. Obshhestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu // per. s nem. V. Sedel’nika i N. Fedorovoj. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2000. 384 p.
4. Behmann G. Sovremennoe obshhestvo: obshhestvo riska, informacionnoe obshhestvo, obshhestvo znanij. M.: Logos, 2010. 248 p.
5. Bernstajn P. Protiv bogov: Ukroshhenie riska / per. s angl. M.: ZAO «Olimp-Biznes», 2000. 400 p.
6. Vildavski A., Dejk K.Teorija vosprijatija riska: kto boitsja, chego i pochemu //THESIS. 1994. № 5. P. 268–276.
7. Giddens Je. Sud’ba, risk i bezopasnost’ // THESIS. 1994. № 5. P. 107–134.
8. Giddens Je. Uskol’zajushhij mir: kak globalizacija menjaet nashu zhizn’. SPb.: Izd-vo «Ves’ mir», 2004. P. 23–36.
9. Glushhenko V.V. Upravlenie riskami. Strahovanie. Zheleznodorozhnyj, Mosk. obl.: TOO NPC «Kryl’ja», 1999. 336 p.
10. Duglas M. Chistota i opasnost’: analiz predstavlenij ob oskvernenii i tabu. M.: KanonPress-C: Kuchkovo pole, 2000. 286 p.
11. Diev V.S. Risk: ocenka i prinjatie reshenij // Filosofija nauki. 2010. № 4 (47). P. 15–32.
12. Zubkov V.I. Risk kak ob#ekt sociologicheskogo analiza: avtoref. diss. … d-ra soc. nauk. M., 2005.
13. Kovaleva M.S. Jevoljucija ponjatija «risk» // Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. 2002. T. 2. № 1. P. 18–26.
14. Luman N. Ponjatie riska // THESIS. 1994. № 5. P. 135–160.
15. Obshhestvo riska i chelovek: ontologicheskij i cennostnye aspekty. Saratov: Nauka, 2006. 289 p.
16. Renn O. Tri desjatiletija issledovanija riska: dostizhenija i novye gorizonty // Voprosy analiza riska. 1999. № 1. P. 80–99.
17. Shherba M.A. Vosprijatie riskov v period modernizacii obshhestva kak ob#ekt gosudarstvennogo regulirovanija // Vestnik social’no-politicheskih nauk. 2011. № 10. P. 121–130.
18. Janickij O.N. Sociologija riska: kljuchevye idei // Mir Rossii. 2003. № 1. P. 3–35.
19. Bechmann G. Einleitung: Risiko – ein neues Forschungsfeld? // Bechmann G. (Hrsg.), Risiko und Gesellschaft. Grundlagen und Ergebnisse interdisziplinärer Risikoforschung. 1993. P. 237–276.
20. Douglas M., Wildavsky A.Risk and Culture:An Essay on the Selection ofTechnological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1982.
21. Shrader-Frechette K.S. Risk analysis and scientific method. Methodological and ethical problems with evaluating societal hazards. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985. P. 232.
22. Hofsted G. Model’ Hofstede v kontekste: parametry kolichestvennoj harakteristiki kul’tury // http://lse2010.narod.ru/olderfiles/LSE2014pdf/LSE2014Hofstede.pdf (data obrashhenija: 02.06.2018).
Review
For citations:
Tuzhba Z.E. Theoretical Concepts of Risk in Social and Humanitarian Knowledge. Vestnik NSUEM. 2020;(1):203-218. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2020-1-203-218
Email this article 
