Comparative Analysis of the Budgetary Sufficiency of the Novosibirsk
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2021-3-050-062
Abstract
The paper considers a comparative analysis of the structure of budget revenues of the city of Novosibirsk, both among other cities with a population of over one million in the Russian Federation, and among the municipalities of the Novosibirsk region. The structure of city budgets was assessed both from the point of view of their provision with tax and non-tax revenues received directly on the territory, and from the standpoint of dependence on transfers from the higher budget for the period 2011–2018. In addition, the possibility of the use of budget resources to identify the main areas of spending in large cities is analyzed. The fact of essential reduction of budgetary independence of the largest cities in the Russian Federation over the period of analysis considered is revealed.
About the Author
T. V. Sumskaya
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sumskaya Tatyana V., Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor
Novosibirsk
References
1. Bufetova A.N. Struktura urbanizacii i tendencii vnutriregional’noj differenciacii urovnja zhizni // Vestnik NGU. Serija: Social’no-jekonomicheskie nauki. 2013. T. 13. Vyp. 1. P. 57–66.
2. Gusev A., Jurevich M. Goroda federal’nogo znachenija kak istochnik jekonomicheskogo rosta // Obshhestvo i jekonomika. 2017. № 2. P. 53–70.
3. Zhiharevich B.S., Pribyshin T.K. Strategii razvitija gorodov: rossijskaja praktika 2014– 2019 gg. // Prostranstvennaja jekonomika. 2019. T. 15. № 4. P. 184–204.
4. Zubarevich N.V. Razvitie rossijskih aglomeracij: tendencii, resursy i vozmozhnosti upravlenija // Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2017. № 6. P. 5–21.
5. Zubarevich N.V. Goroda na postsocialisticheskom prostranstve // Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2010. № 5. P. 5–19.
6. Izotov D.A. Jekonomicheskij rost i urbanizacija v Rossii: regional’nyj aspekt // Region: jekonomika i sociologija. 2017. № 3 (95). P. 69–92.
7. Kolozhvari Je.S., Glazychev K.A., Bahareva Ju.P., Hramcova O.V. Strategicheskoe planirovanie na municipal’nom urovne: opyt goroda Novosibirska // Sibirskaja finansovaja shkola. 2017. № 1. P. 57–66.
8. Kolomak E.A. Razvitie gorodskoj sistemy Sibiri v postsovetskij period: prognozy i real’nost’ // JeKO. 2018. № 7. P. 57–66.
9. Kolomak E.A. Razvitie gorodskoj sistemy Rossii: tendencii i faktory // Voprosy jekonomiki. 2014. № 10. P. 82–96.
10. Kosareva N., Polidi T. Ocenka valovogo gorodskogo produkta v rossijskih gorodah i ego vklada v VVP Rossii v 2000–2015 gg. // Voprosy jekonomiki. 2017. № 7. P. 5–23.
11. Krinichanskij K.V. Sovremennyj rossijskij gorod v svete tendencij urbanisticheskogo mira // Regional’naja jekonomika: teorija i praktika. 2013. № 32 (311). P. 3–13.
12. Kuznecova O. Vozrastajushhaja rol’ gorodov-millionerov: opyt Germanii v kontekste rossijskih problem // Federalizm. 2018. № 4. P. 37–50.
13. Levina V.V. Osobennosti regulirovanija mezhbjudzhetnyh otnoshenij sub#ektov RF i gorodskih okrugov // Finansy. 2018. № 10. P. 32–37.
14. Sumskaja T.V. Ocenka osnovnyh napravlenij bjudzhetnoj politiki na subfederal’nom urovne // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2015. № 2. P. 83–105.
15. Chernjakov M.K. Investicionnaja privlekatel’nost’ Novosibirska: rejtingovaja ocenka // Sibirskaja finansovaja shkola. 2012. № 2. P. 136–140.
Review
For citations:
Sumskaya T.V. Comparative Analysis of the Budgetary Sufficiency of the Novosibirsk. Vestnik NSUEM. 2021;(3):50-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2021-3-050-062
Email this article 
