Generation and reception of information component of robust control of social and economic systems

Area of study – external reflexively active environment with covering of information «cloudiness of turbulent mixing» of elements-data. Subject of study – methods of arrangement of information chaos, included in the processes of generation and reception of information. The aim consists both in the development of theoretical concepts of external reflexively active environment, formed by information media, and in the elaboration of maximally plausible model of reflection of the environmental «reality» in mental «vision» of decision makers.

Tasks. Generalization of the fundamental scientific presuppositions of the «knowledge» category, falling into the conceptual framework of the theory of robust stability and explaining high sensitivity of the system to changes in initial data. Structuring of information chaoscovering of the environment under study, through examination of the generation process: selection of sources of information generation; arrangement of the concepts of area of study – «reproduction of new». Determination of the nature of «information cloudiness» in accordance with offered hierarchy of information structures, revelation of their covering via the use of the apparatus, describing entity characteristics of the behavior of reception process. Formation of the matrix of connectedness of types of structural formations of «information cloudiness» and cognitive tools of reception.

Methodology. Logic of the study is built on dichotomy of the «appearance» and «reality» categories. The retrospective analysis considers the development of the approaches to structuring of external environment as an early stage of reproduction of the knowledge concerning object. The existing knowledge concerning external environment is supplemented, on the one hand, by the detailed decomposition of its structural model, on the other hand, by the development of the concepts of the methods of recognition of data entered into certain «information cloudiness». The objectness of information reception is reflected by formalized structures, composing cognitive tools of the transformer of information into knowledge.

Results. Information sensitivity of robust control is justified, and a hierarchical model of information structures of external reflexively active environment is built. The types of «information cloudiness», making it possible to realize typological grouping of data, are defined for each structural formation. The matrix of connectedness of structural formations is built on the grounds of: types of «information cloudiness»; cognitive tools of reception. Scientific novelty lies in formation of the methodological approach revealing logic of the study. The application of the approach makes it possible to create the reflection, maximally close to «reality», of entity characteristics of chaotic external reflexively active environment filled with uncertainty and turbulent information flows; in building a mental  model of decision maker, – their «vision» through transformation of reality via processes of generation of information structures and reception of «information cloudiness», covering of structural formations, by clustering of data and formalization of structures concerning transformation of information into knowledge. Currently important line of research is aimed at reaching maximum reflection of real state of information space of external environment in the mental model of decision maker, caused by the increasing requirements applicable to quality of information and its significant influence, exercised on the effectiveness of management activities.

1. Akoff R.L., Jemeri F. O celeustremlennyh sistemah [On Purposeful Systems], Moscow, Sovetskoe radio [Soviet Radio], 1974. 272 p.

2. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V. K teorii gibkoj adaptacii jekonomicheskih sistem posredstvom robastnogo upravlenija [Toward a Theory of Flexible Adaptation of Economic Systems through Robust Control], Fundamental'nye issledovanija [Fundamental Research], 2019, no. 6, pp. 7–17.

3. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V., Hrushhev S.E. Upravlenie slozhnymi sistemami: predely i preobrazovanie informacii v povedenie [Management of complex systems: limits and transformation of information into behavior], Razvitie territorij [Territory Development], 2021, no. 1 (23), pp. 21–30. https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2021-1-21-30

4. Alekseev M.A., Alekseev E.E., Frejdina E.V., Tropin A.A. Parametricheskaja robastnost' kak tehnologicheskij i finansovyj mehanizm upravlenija jekonomicheskimi sistemami [Parametric robustness as a technological and financial mechanism of management of economic systems], Vestnik NGUJeU [Vestnik NSUEM], 2019, no. 4, pp. 143–161.

5. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V., Tropin A.A. Jevoljucionnyj podhod k koncepcii robastnogo upravlenija jekonomicheskimi sistemami [Evolutionary approach to the concept of robust management of economic systems], Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals], 2018, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3–18.

6. Bir St. Kibernetika i upravlenie proizvodstvom [Cybernetics and Production Management], per. s angl. [translated from English], Moscow, Gos. izd-vo fiz.-mat. literatury [State Publishing House of Physics and Mathematics], 1963, 274 p.

7. Bobrov L.K., Cherepova Ju.V. Kratkij obzor podhodov k upravleniju znanijami [A Brief Review of Knowledge Management Approaches], Razvitie territorij [Territory Development], 2021, no. 2 (24), pp. 83–93. https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-20212-83-93

8. Budanov V.G. Metodologija i principy sinergetiki [Methodology and Principles of Synergetics], Filosofija osviti [Philosophy of Education], 2006, no. 1 (3), pp. 143–172.

9. Gajkazjan I.V. Zakony informacii kak dobycha sinergeticheskogo bumeranga [Laws of Information as a Mining Synergetic Boomerang], Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti [Synergetic Paradigm. Synergetics of Innovative Complexity], Moscow, Progress-Tradicija [Progress-Tradition], 2011, pp. 464–479.

10. Glinskiy V.V. Statisticheskie metody podderzhki upravlencheskih reshenij [Statistical methods of supporting managerial decisions], Novosibirsk, Izd-vo NGUJeU [Publishing house of NSUEM], 2008, 256 p.

11. Dettmer U. Teorija ogranichenij Goldratta: Sistemnyj podhod k nepreryvnomu sovershenstvovaniju [Goldratt Theory of Constraints: A Systemic Approach to Continuous Improvement], per. s angl. [translated from English], Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks [Alpina Business Books], 2008, 444 p.

12. Kotler F. Osnovy marketinga [Fundamentals of Marketing], per. s angl. [translated from English], Moscow, Progress [Progress], 1990, 656 p.

13. Krasikov V.I. Jetjudy samosoznanija [Etudes of Self-Consciousness]. Moskva – Berlin, Direkt-Media [Moscow-Berlin, Direkt-Media], 2014, 397 p.

14. Levin K. Teorija polja v social'nyh naukah [Field Theory in the Social Sciences], per. s angl. [translated from English], SPb.: Sensor [SPb.: Sensor], 2000, 365 p.

15. Lepskij V.E. Refleksivno-aktivnye sredy innovacionnogo razvitija [Reflexive Active Environments of Innovative Development], Moscow, Kogito-Centr [Cogito-Center], 2010, 255 p.

16. Lefevr V.A. O samoorganizujushhihsja i samorefleksivnyh sistemah [On Self-Organizing and Self-Reflective Systems], Refleksivnye processy i upravlenie [Reflexive Processes and Control], 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–35.

17. Menar K. Jekonomika organizacii [Economy of Organization], per. s franc. [translated from French], Moscow, INFRA, 1996, 160 p.

18. Minakov V.F. Informacionnye processy v formirovanii azhiotazhnyh ciklov [Information processes in the formation of agitation cycles], Razvitie territorij [Territory Development], 2021, no. 2 (24), pp. 76–82. https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-20212-76-82

19. Nort D. Ponimanie processa jekonomicheskih izmenenij [Understanding the Process of Economic Change], per. s angl. [translated from English], Moscow, Izd. dom Gos. unta Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki [Publishing house of the State University of the Higher School of Economics], 2010, 256 p.

20. Porter M. Konkurentnaja strategija: Metodika analiza otraslej i konkurentov [Competitive Strategy: Methodology of Industry and Competitor Analysis], 3-e izd. [3rd ed.], Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks [Alpina Business Books], 2007, pp. 78–82.

21. Pospelov D.A. Logiko-lingvisticheskie modeli v sistemah upravlenija [Logic-linguistic models in control systems], Moscow, Jenergoatomizdat [Energoatomizdat], 1981, 232 p.

22. Prangishvili I.V. Sistemnyj podhod i obshhesistemnye zakonomernosti. Serija «Sistemnye problemy upravlenija» [System approach and system-wide regularities. Series «System Problems of Management»], Moscow, SINTEG, 2000, 538 p.

23. Prigozhin I. Porjadok iz haosa. Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj [Order out of Chaos. A New Dialogue between Man and Nature], per. s angl. [translated from English], Moscow, Nauka [Science], 1986, pp. 34–37.

24. Rozin V.M. O neobhodimosti razlichija ponjatij «shema refleksii», «refleksivnaja rabota», «kontekst refleksii» [On the Necessity of Distinguishing the Concepts of Reflexion, Reflexive Work, and Reflexive Context], Refleksivnye processy i upravlenie [Reflexive Processes and Control], 2005, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 55–61.

25. Stepin V.S. Istoricheskie tipy nauchnoj racional'nosti v ih otnoshenii k probleme slozhnosti [Historical types of scientific rationality in their relation to the problem of complexity], Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti [Synergetic paradigm. Synergetics of Innovative Complexity], Moscow, ProgressTradicija [Progress-Tradition], 2011, pp. 37–46.

26. Tret'jakov O.V. Informacionnye processy: filosofsko-metodologicheskie aspekty [Information Processes: Philosophical and Methodological Aspects], Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scientific Notes of Oryol State University], 2014, no. 1 (5), pp. 159–162.

27. Uajthed A.N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii [Selected Works in Philosophy], per. s angl. [Translated from English], Moscow, Progress [Progress], 1990, 717 p.

28. Uil'jamson O.I. Jekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma. Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaja» kontraktacija [The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, Markets, «Relationship» Contracting]. SPb.: Lenizdat; CEV Press [St. Petersburg: Lenizdat; CEV Press], 1996, 702 p.

29. Frejdina E.V. Koroh A.A. Razvitie metodologii refleksivnogo upravlenija i instrumentarija kognitivnoj funkcii [Development of Reflexive Management Methodology and Cognitive Function Toolkit], Vestnik NGUJeU [Vestnik NSUEM], 2011, no. 2, pp. 27–51.

30. Hetel' G., Prahalad K., G.Tomas G., O´Nil D. Strategicheskaja gibkost' [Strategic Flexibility], per. s angl. [translated from English], SPb.: Piter [Peter], 2005, 384 p.

31. Shhedrovickij G.P. Refleksija i ee problemy [Reflexion and Its Problems], Refleksivnye processy i upravlenie [Reflexive Processes and Management], 2001, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47–54.

32. Jejzenhardt K., Sull D. Strategija kak svod prostyh pravil [Strategy as a Code of Simple Rules], Novye podhody k strategii biznesa [New Approaches to Business Strategy], per. s angl. [translated from English], Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks [Alpina Business Books], 2007, pp. 104–133.

33. Davis L., North D. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, Cambridge, 1971.

34. Lawrence P., Lorsch J. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, 1967, 279 p.