сгенерировать QR код
Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Специфика корпоративной социальной ответственности в условиях дистанционной занятости работников
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2025-3-221-237
Аннотация
Актуальность изучения различных аспектов корпоративной социальной ответственности является предметом всевозможных исследований в последние десятилетия. Однако в современный период новая экономическая парадигма, основанная на цифровых технологиях и информационных сетях, коренным образом меняет традиционную экономическую среду и виды деятельности, что приводит к глубокой реструктуризации корпоративных бизнес-моделей, организационных структур и моделей рыночной конкуренции. В работе представлен широкий обзор международных и отечественных исследований, связанных с проблемой корпоративной социальной ответственности. Статья разбита на несколько разделов, касающихся отдельных вопросов корпоративной социальной ответственности и дедуктивно раскрывающих ее значение для эффективного функционирования организации. Ключевыми аспектами работы выступили интерпретация взаимосвязи между корпоративной социальной ответственностью и цифровыми технологиями, оценка дискуссии о корпоративной социальной ответственности и корпоративной цифровой социальной ответственности, наконец, разработка вопроса о специфике формирования корпоративной социальной ответственности в ситуации удаленной занятости персонала. Использование библиографического метода в интерпретации проблемы корпоративной социальной ответственности позволило дать четкое понимание обсуждаемых вопросов. Данные, полученные в ходе исследования, послужили основой для разработки рекомендаций по рассматриваемой проблеме.
Об авторах
С. М. Васин
Пензенский государственный университет
Россия
Россия
Васин Сергей Михайлович, доктор экономических наук, профессор, проректор по научной работе и инновационной деятельности, профессор кафедры социологии, экономической теории и международных процессов
Пенза
Ю. Е. Прохорова
Пензенский государственный университет
Россия
Россия
Прохорова Юлия Евгеньевна, кандидат экономических наук
Пенза
Список литературы
1. Статистика Upwork за 2024 год (пользователи, рост и тенденции). URL: https:// www.demandsage.com/upwork-statistics
2. Эксперты. Число вакансий на удаленке продолжает расти. URL: https://rg.ru/2023/10/24/kadry-derzhat-distanciiu.html.
3. Bapuji H., Patel C., Ertug G., Allen D.G. Corona crisis and inequality: Why management research needs a societal turn // Journal of Management. 2020. P. 1205–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320925881
4. Давлетов И.И., Пушкарев А.П. Корпоративная социальная ответственность как механизм формирования системы социальной защиты работников // Economics. 2021. № 2 (49). С. 29–31. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/
5. Kong D., Liu B. Digital Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China // Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade. 2023. Vol. 59. P. 2967–2993. https://doi.org/1080/1540496X.2023.2199122
6. Li L. Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence // Ind. Market Manag. 2022. Vol. 104. P. 28–37. https://doi.оrg/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.007
7. Tuyen B.Q., Phuong Anh, D.V., Mai N.P., Long T.Q. Does corporate engagement in social responsibility affect firm innovation? The mediating role of digital transformation // Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2022. Vol. 84. P. 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.11.005
8. Huang G., Shen L. The Bidirectional Relationship between Digital Transformation and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Legitimacy Perspective // Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 16. P. 3029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073029
9. Vogler D., Eisenegger M. CSR communication, corporate reputation, and the role of the news media as an agenda-setter in the digital age // Bus. Soc. 2021. Vol. 60. P. 1957– 1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320928969
10. Stahl B.C. From Corporate Digital Responsibility to Responsible Digital Ecosystems // Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 16. P. 4972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124972
11. Lobschat L., Mueller B., Eggers F., Brandimarte L., Diefenbach S., Kroschke M. & Wirtz J. Corporate digital responsibility // Journal of Business Research. 2021. Vol. 122. P. 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00760-0
12. Thorun C. Corporate Digital Responsibility: Unternehmerische Verantwortung in der digitalen Welt. In: Gärtner C., Heinrich C. (eds). Fallstudien zur Digitalen Transformation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2018. P. 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00760-0
13. Herden C.J., Alliu E., Cakici A. et al. Corporate Digital Responsibility // Nachhaltigkeits Management Forum. 2021. Vol. 29. P. 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00509-x
14. Van der Merwe J., Al Achkar Z. Data responsibility, corporate social responsibility, and corporate digital responsibility. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.2
15. Lobschat L., Mueller B., Eggers F., Brandimarte L., Diefenbach S., Kroschke M., Wirtz J. Corporate digital responsibility // J. Bus. Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006
16. Elliott K., Price R., Shaw P. et al. Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) // Society. 2021. Vol. 58, no. 3. P. 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8
17. Nilles J.M., Carlson E.R.Jr., Gray P., Hanneman G.J. The Telecommunications–Transportation Tradeoff: Options for Tomorrow; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1976. URL: https://www.academia.edu/59921845/Telecommuting_An_Alternative_to_Urban_Transportation_Congestion
18. Safirova E. Telecommuting, traffic congestion, and agglomeration: A general equilibrium model // J. Urban Econ. 2002. Vol. 52. P. 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00016-5
19. Morgan R.E. Teleworking: an assessment of the benefits and challenges // European Business Review. 2004. Vol. 16, no. 4. P. 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340410699613
20. Golden T.D., Veiga J.F., Dino R.N. The Impact of Professional Isolation on Teleworker Job Performance and Turnover Intentions: Does Time Spent Teleworking, Interacting Face-to-Face, or Having Access to Communication-Enhancing Technology Matter? // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008. Vol. 93, no. 6. P. 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012722
21. Savić D. COVID-19 and work from home: Digital transformation of the workforce // Grey J. 2020. Vol. 16. P. 101–104. https://www.researchgate.net/
22. Serrano-Macias M., Alvarez-Galvez J. Mental Health and (Online) Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain: A Network-Based Approach // Behav. Sci. 2024. Vol. 14. P. 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090735
23. Maresca G.G. Diagnosis of Teleworking in Argentina during the Pandemic: Application of the Telework Efficiency Index // Adm. Sci. 2024. Vol. 14. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14070135
24. Araya F., Poblete P., Salazar L.A., Sánchez O., Sierra-Varela L., Filun Á. Exploring the Influence of Construction Companies Characteristics on Their Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Chilean Context // Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 16. P. 3417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083417
25. Parent-Lamarche A., Marchand A. Trajectories of Teleworking via Work Organization Conditions: Unraveling the Effect on Work Engagement and Intention to Quit with Path Analyses // Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15. P. 8476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118476
26. Vasin S.M. Comparative Analysis of Socioeconomic Models in COVID-19 Pandemic // Economies. 2022. Vol. 10, no. 11. P. 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10110278
27. Alassaf P., El-assaf B.M., Szalay Z.G. Worker’s Satisfaction and Intention toward Working from Home–Foreign Non-EU Citizens vs. National Workers’ Approach: Case Study of Central European Countries (Visegrád Group (V4)) // Adm. Sci. 2023. Vol. 13. P. 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13030088
28. Dwivedi M., Kumar V. Impact of lockdown and CSR activities undertaken by the corporates during COVID-19 in India // International journal of Indian culture and business management. 2021. No. 22 (4). P. 558–589. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.10035635
29. Goldman T., Weil D. Who’s Responsible Here? Establishing Legal Responsibility in the Fissured Workplace // Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series. 2020. no. 114. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.36687/inetwp114
30. Savic D. Digital Transformation and Grey Literature Professionals // Grey Journal. 2020. February 16 (Special Winter Issue). P. 11–17. URL: https://bit.ly/2XeMA8u
31. Нурмухаметов Н.Н., Бекетова К.Н. Корпоративная социальная ответственность – основа укрепления стратегического развития крупных предприятий машиностроения // Central Asian Economic Review. 2022. № 2 (143). С. 28–44. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2022-2-28-44
32. Dixit S. Corporate social responsibility: A critical appraisal // World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2023. Vol. 17. P. 421–429. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.2.0253
33. Palumbo R. Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2020. Vol. 33. P. 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0150
34. Raišienė A.G., Rapuano V., Dőry T., Varkulevičiūtė K. Does telework work? Gauging challenges of telecommuting to adapt to a «new normal» // Hum. Technol. 2021. Vol. 17. P. 126. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2021.17-2.3
35. Lyzwinsk L.-N. Organizational and Occupational Health Issues with Working Remotely during the Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Remote Work and Health // Journal of Occupational Health. 2024. Vol. 66, iss. 1, January-December, uiae 005. https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae005
36. Yu M.-C., Mai Q., Tsai S.-B., Dai Y. An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability // Sustainability. 2018. Vol. 10. P. 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030864
37. Babapour Chafi, Maral Annemarie Hultberg, and Nina Bozic Yams. Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment // Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. P. 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010294
38. Popovici V. and Popovici A.L. Remote Work Revolution: Current Opportunities and Challenges for Organizations. Ovidius University Annals: Economic Sciences Series. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Remote-Work-Revolution%3ACurrent-Opportunities-and-Popovici/487246b70dd92aa30ab60d50d47099a350f93f55
39. Nakrošienė A., Bučiūnienė I., Goštautaitė B. Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework // International journal of labor. 2019. Vol. 40, no. 1. P. 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172
40. Buomprisco G., Ricci S., Perri R., De Sio S. Health and telework: New challenges after COVID-19 pandemic // Eur. J. Environ. Public Health. 2021. Vol. 5. P. 0073. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/9705
41. Degryse C. Digitalisation of the Economy and Its Impact on Labour Markets. ETUI Working Paper, 2016, 02. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2730550
42. Panchuk E.Y. Organization of remote work: Benefits and challenges. Scientific Papers Collection of the Angarsk State Technical University. 2023. P. 380–385. https://doi.org/10.36629/2686-7788-2023-1-380-385
43. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy // Harvard Business Review. 2002. Vol. 12. URL: https://hbr.org/2002/12/the-competitiveadvantage-of-corporate-philanthropy
44. Ioannou I., Serafeim G. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Investment Recommendations: Analysts’ Perceptions and Shifting Institutional Logics // Strategic Management Journal. 2015. Vol. 36, no. 7. P. 1053–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2268
45. Hinings B., Gegenhuber T., Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective // Information and Organization. 2018. Vol. 28, no. 1. P. 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
46. Madanaguli A., Srivastava S., Ferraris A., Dhi A. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in the tourism sector: A systematic literature review and future outlook // Sustain. Dev. 2022. Vol. 30. P. 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2258
47. Malik S.Y., Hayat Mughal, Y., Azam T., Cao Y., Wan Z., Zhu H., Thurasamy R. Corporate social responsibility, green human resources management, and sustainable performance: Is organizational citizenship behavior towards environment the missing link? // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. P. 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1303104
48. Glavas A., Kelley K. The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 24, no, 2. P. 165–202. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20143206
49. Han X., Li Q., Wang, X. Investigating How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Employees’ Thriving at Work: A Social Exchange Perspective // Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 16. P. 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031095/
50. Мурмыло Д.Ю. Концепция благополучия сотрудников как основа социальной ответственности организаций // Экономический вектор. 2023. № 1 (32). С. 18–21. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru
51. Zhou H., Wang Q. and Zhao X. Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a comparative study // Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2020. Vol. 120, no. 5. P. 863– 882. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2019-0493
52. Peloza J. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance // J. Manag. 2009. Vol. 35. P. 1518–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335188
53. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F.L., Rynes S.L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis // Organ. Stud. 2003. Vol. 24. P. 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
54. Berman S.L., Wicks A.C., Kotha S. and Jones T.M. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance // Academy of Management Journal. 1999. Vol. 42, no. 5. Р. 488–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/256972
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Васин С.М., Прохорова Ю.Е. Специфика корпоративной социальной ответственности в условиях дистанционной занятости работников. Вестник НГУЭУ. 2025;(3):221-237. https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2025-3-221-237
For citation:
Vasin S.M., Prokhorova Yu.E. Specificity of corporate social responsibility in the conditions of remote employment of workers. Vestnik NSUEM. 2025;(3):221-237. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2025-3-221-237
Послать статью по эл. почте 
