Intelligent system for multicriteria adaptive optimization of the investment projecting process
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2026-1-028-042
Abstract
In conditions of high socio-economic uncertainty and multiple goals of in- vestors, the use of multicriteria optimization in investment projecting allows finding balanced solutions that take into account various factors and preferences, which increases the efficiency and sustainability of investment projects. The article considers the problem of developing an intelligent computer software system for optimizing adaptive control of the investment design process. It is proposed to use network models and methods as a tool for economic and mathematical modeling of the solution to this problem. The paper presents a new optimization network economic and mathematical model that takes into account the presence of several options for acceptable technologies in the investment projecting process, various options for their implementation and using a vector objective function to assess the quality of project implementation. Based on solving a set of network modeling problems of investment projecting processes corresponding to acceptable technologies and various options for their implementation, using the construction of critical paths and the scalarization method of a specific vector objective function, a technique for solving the formed vector optimization problem is proposed. The developed original methodology allows to implement the process of automation and optimization of adaptive control of the investment projecting process based on network modeling, including coding of all operations of investment projecting, determination of interrelations of operations, sequence and terms of their implementation. Based on the proposed methodology, an intelligent computer software system for optimization of adaptive control of the investment prijecting process in the presence of several technologies and a vector target function has been developed and created. The created intelligent computer system OptimumInvest allows to implement automation, optimization and support of management decision-making using feedback in the implementation of complex investment projects.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. F. ShorikovRussian Federation
Shorikov Andrey F. – Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher, Center for Structural Policy, Institute of Economics
Yekaterinburg
E. V. Butsenko
Russian Federation
Butsenko Elena V. – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Business Informatics
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Kelley J.E., & Walker M.R. Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling. Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference. 1959. P. 160–173. DOI: 10.1145/1460299.1460318.
2. Malcolm D.G., Roseboom J.H., Clark C.E. & Fazar W. Application of a Technique for Research and Development Program Evaluation. Operations Research. 1959. Vol. 7, no. 5. P. 646–669. DOI: 10.1287/opre.7.5.646.
3. Hwang C.L. & Masud A.S.M. Multiple Objective Decision Making – Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag, 1979. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45511-7.
4. Zeleny M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, 1982.
5. Kerzner H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
6. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). 7th Edition. Project Management Institute, 2021.
7. Turban E., Sharda R. & Delen D. Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems. Pearson Education, 2010.
8. Power D.J. & Sharda R. Model-Driven Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Research Directions. Decision Support Systems. 2007. Vol. 43, no. 3. P. 1044–1061. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.030.
9. Shorikov A.F. Setevaya model’ dlya mnogokriterial’noi optimizatsii upravleniya proektami [Network model for multi-criteria optimization of project management]. Sistemnoe modelirovanie sotsial’no-ehkonomicheskikh protsessov: trudy 39-i mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi shkoly-seminara im. akad. S.S. Shatalina [System modeling of socio-economic processes: proceedings of the 39th international scientific schoolseminar named after academician S.S. Shatalin]. Voronezh: Voronezh State Pedagogical University, 2016, pp. 370–374.
10. Shorikov A.F. Setevaya matematicheskaya model’ optimizatsii adaptivnogo upravleniya proektami pri nalichii neskol’kikh tekhnologii ikh realizatsii [Network mathematical model for optimizing adaptive project management in the presence of several technologies for their implementation]. Analiz, modelirovanie, upravlenie, razvitie sotsial’no-ehkonomicheskikh sistem (AMUR-2020): XIV Vserossiiskaya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem shkola-simpozium: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Analysis, modeling, management, development of socio-economic systems (AMUR-2020): XIV All-Russian school-symposium with international participation: collection of scientific papers]. Simferopol: IP Kornienko A.A., 2020, pp. 399–405.
11. Keeney R.L. & Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
12. Shorikov A.F., Butsenko E.V. Setevoe modelirovanie optimizatsii protsessov investitsionnogo proektirovaniya pri nalichii neskol’kikh tekhnologii [Network modeling of optimization processes of investment projecting in the presence of multiple technologies], Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: Ehkonomika i upravlenie [Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management], 2016, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 926–943. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2016.15.6.046.
13. Shiryaev V.I. Algoritmy upravleniya dinamicheskimi sistemami v usloviyakh neopredelennosti. Chast’ 1 [Algorithms for controlling dynamic systems under uncertainty. Part 1], Mekhatronika, avtomatizatsiya, upravlenie [Mechatronics, automation, control], 2024, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 279–288. DOI: 10.17587/mau.25.279-288.
Review
For citations:
Shorikov A.F., Butsenko E.V. Intelligent system for multicriteria adaptive optimization of the investment projecting process. Vestnik NSUEM. 2026;(1):28-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2026-1-028-042

























