TO THE QUESTION OF NEED OF FORMATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF AUDIT
Abstract
The hypothesis is formulated and locates in article that absence of academically issued scientific theory of audit is a factor provoking doubts in an institutional solvency of auditor activity. The arguments proving imbalance and separate nature of existing provisions of science about audit as systems of scientific knowledge are adduced. The conclusion about need of carrying out complex, including the interdisciplinary researches directed on cultivation of the scientific theory of audit as to organized area of economic science is drawn. Basic system problems of theoretical design of auditor science are formulated, the key problems interfering its formation reveal. The points of view of various schools of sciences on structure, mutual correlation and the content of the main attributes of the scientific theory of audit are characterized and are critically estimated; on the basis of the analysis of experience of foreign and domestic researches the directions of overcoming of the saved up internal and external contradictions of auditor science and practice are offered.
About the Author
P. P. Baranov
Siberian State Industrial University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Accounting and Auditing
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Accounting and Auditing
References
1. Baranov P.P. Ugroza utraty institucional’nogo statusa auditorskoj deja-tel’nosti v uslovijah stagnacii teorii audita // Sibirskaja finansovaja shkola. 2012. № 6. P. 144–150.
2. Baranov P.P. Genezis teorii audita: predposylki zarozhdenija, problemy razvitija, sovremennoe sostojanie // Innovacionnoe razvitie jekonomiki. 2013. № 2. P. 85–101.
3. Baranov P.P. Pozitivnyj i normativnyj podhody k issledovaniju problem formirovanija professional’nogo suzhdenija v audite: al’ternativa ili simbioz? // Upravlencheskij uchet. 2012. № 11. P. 79–85.
4. Baranov P.P. Auditorskaja nauka na fone krizisnyh javlenij v jekonomike: prioritetnye napravlenija razvitija i predmetnye oblasti issledovanij // Mezhdunarodnyj buhgalter- skij uchjot. 2012. № 20. P. 35–42.
5. Baranov P.P. Prichiny modifikacii auditorskogo zakljuchenija // Auditor. 2004. № 1. P. 25–28.
6. Bol’shoj jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ / I. Lapina, E. Matalina. M.: AST, Astrel’. 2008. 1247 p.
7. Gutcajt E.M. Audit i drugie nauki // Auditor. 2010. № 10. P. 15–26.
8. Karel’skaja S.N, Zuga E.I. Opredelenie paradigm buhgalterskogo uchjota v rabotah Ja.V. Sokolova // Finansy i biznes. 2012. № 4. P. 174–185.
9. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revoljucij. M., 2003.
10. Menedzhment organizacii: ucheb. posobie / Z.P. Rumjanceva, N.A. Salomatin, R.Z. Akberdin i dr. M.: INFRA-M, 1995. 432 p.
11. Sokolov Ja.V. Tri paradigmy dvojnoj buhgalterii // Buhgalterskij uchet. 2005. № 15. P. 49–53.
12. Sokolov Ja.V. Buhgalterskij uchjot ot istokov do nashih dnej: ucheb. posobie dlja vu- zov. M.: Audit, JuNITI, 1996. 638 p.
13. Teorija audita: ucheb. Posobie / S.I. Zhmin’ko, O.I. Shvyreva, M.F., Safonova, I.N. Kalinina. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2013. 443 p.
14. Sheremet A.D. Reformirovanie buhgalterskogo ucheta i audita v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodnymi standartami // Auditorskie vedomosti. 2006. № 8. P. 4–12.
15. Limperg Th. De beteekenis van de accountantsverklaring in verband met de verantwoordelijkheid van den accountant, Muuses, Purmerend.1926.
16. Mautz R.K., Sharaf H. The Philosophy of Auditing: Sarasota, Fl.: American Accounting Association, 1961. 299 p.
17.
Review
For citations:
Baranov P.P. TO THE QUESTION OF NEED OF FORMATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF AUDIT. Vestnik NSUEM. 2013;(4):84-100. (In Russ.)
Email this article 
