REGIONAL DIFFERENTIATION FORMATION OF INCOME BUDGET OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Abstract
This article analyzes the differentiation of budget sources according to major regional economic indicators, influencing the formation of the tax base. It is calculated rank correlation coefficient in terms of GRP per capita of the subjects of the Russian Federation to assess the structural changes of regions with respect to their mutual position of the period of1995–2013.The relationship of wages is studied by economic activity,sex,age and education in the territorial aspect. A direct relationship is detected between the level of wages and economic activity, employment in the regions. As the suggestion to improve, the selfsufficiency of territories is offered to increase innovative activity and implementation of competitive advantage, mainly due to the competitive advantages of the region.
About the Authors
V. S. Mkhitaryan
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Statistics and Data Analysis, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
S. S. Mikhaylova
East Siberia State University of Technology and Management, Ulan-Ude, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Economics, East Siberia State University of Technology and Management, Ulan-Ude, Russia
References
1. Granberg A.G. Modelirovanie prostranstvennogo razvitija jekonomiki // Strategi- cheskoe planirovanie v regionah i gorodah Rossii. Vyp. 9. SPb., 2009. P. 32–34.
2. Mirkin Ja.M. Finansovoe budushhee Rossii: jekstremumy, bumy, sistemnye riski. M., GELEOS Publishing House; Kjepital Trejd Kompani, 2011. 480 p.
3. Mihajlova S.S. Statisticheskij analiz prostranstvennoj differenciacii dohodov pen- sionnoj sistemy // Jekonomika, statistika i informatika. Vestnik UMO. 2014. No 01. P. 149–153.
4. Mhitarjan V.S., Mihajlova S.S. Statisticheskoe issledovanie faktorov, opredeljajushhih dohody pensionnoj sistemy Rossijskoj Federacii // Voprosy statistiki. 2014. No 6. P. 37–42.
5. Nivorozhkina L.I. Dekompozicija neravenstva: metodologija i instrumenty // Naro- donaselenie. 2012. No 2. P. 75–82.
6. Sadovnikova H.A., Shmojlova R.A. Osnovy statisticheskogo modelirovanija. M., MJeSI, 2002. 133 p.
7. Distancionnyj rejting investicionnoj privlekatel’nosti regionov Rossii 2014. [Jelekt- ronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.ra-national.ru/ (data obrashhenija: 18.04.2015).
8. Edinaja mezhvedomstvennaja informacionno-statisticheskaja sistema. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://fedstat.ru (data obrashhenija: 12.04.2015).
9. Investicionnaja privlekatel’nost’ regionov 2013: akcent na infrastrukturu. [Jelektron- nyj resurs]. URL: http://www.raexpert.ru/ratings/regions/2013/ (data obrashhenija: 19.04.20 15).
10. Rossijskij monitoring jekonomicheskogo polozhenija i zdorov’ja naselenija NIU VShJe (RLMS HSE). [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.hse.ru/longitude/ (data obrashhenija: 23.03.2015).
Review
For citations:
Mkhitaryan V.S., Mikhaylova S.S. REGIONAL DIFFERENTIATION FORMATION OF INCOME BUDGET OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Vestnik NSUEM. 2015;(4):16-23. (In Russ.)
Email this article 
