THE PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATIVE CRITERIA FOR REVEALING OF COLLECTIVE DOMINANCE ON GOODS MARKETS OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Abstract
The article contains the analysis of efficiency of Russian antimonopoly law norms,which specify the rules for detecting the dominant position, based on the approach towards the assessment of antimonopoly regulation institutes. It was shown on the example of wholesale electricity market and the oil-refining industry that current legislations’ criteria don’t allow to identify the possibility of economic entities to determinate market conditions. In such situation costs of market agents and antimonopoly authority are increased.
About the Author
S. P. Petrov
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
PhD in Economics
Russian Federation
PhD in Economics
References
1. Petrov S.P., Shmakov A.V. Ocenka nesovershenstva rynka na osnove kriteriev dominirovanija antimonopol’nogo zakonodatel’stva RF: jeffektivnost’ dejstvujushhih norm // Izvestija Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. 2014. T. 324, № 6. P. 36, 38.
2. Petrov S.P. Jekonomicheskij podhod k ocenke jeffektivnosti norm antimonopol’nogo zakonodatel’stva // TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2013. № 3. P. 62–71.
3. Uil’jamson O.I. Jekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaja » kontraktacija. SPb.: Lenizdat; CEV Press, 1996. 702 p.
4. Shumpeter J.A. Kapitalizm, Socializm i Demokratija. M.: Jekonomika, 1995. P. 128–130.
5. Bork R.H. The antitrust paradox: A policy at war with itself. New York: Free Press, 1993. 186 p.
6. Clark J.M. Toward a Concept of Workable Competition / The American Economic Review. Jun., 1940. Vol. 30. No. 2. Part 1. P. 241–256.
7. Kovacic W. Designing antitrust remedies for dominant firm misconduct // Connecticut Law Review, 1999. No. 31. P. 1285–1293.
8. McChensey F. Be true to your school: Conflicting Chicago approaches to antitrust regulations // Cato Journal. 1991. P. 775–798.
9. Posner R. Antitrust law: An economic perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. 316 p.
10. Robinson J. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1969. 352 p.
11. Analiticheskij otchjot po rezul’tatam analiza sostojanija konkurencii na optovom rynke benzinov avtomobil’nyh za 2012 i 2013 gg., Analiticheskij otchjot po rezul’tatam analiza sostojanija konkurencii na optovom rynke dizel’nogo topliva za 2012 i 2013 gg. URL: http://fas.gov.ru/analytical-materials/action=index&sp%5B5%5D=1&text_search=%E0%ED%E0%EB%E8%F2%E8%F7%E5%F1%EA%E8%E9+%EE%F2%F7%E5%F2&ord=1&date_beg=1&h_db=2009-09-14&date_end=1&h_de=2015-04-13 (data obrashhenija: 03.01.2015).
12. Golomolzin A.N. Antimonopol’nyj kontrol’ na rynke avtomobil’nogo topliva. URL:
13. http://www.fas.gov.ru/analytical-materials/analytical-materials_30569.html (data obrashhenija: 13.04.2015).
14. Doklad o sostojanii konkurencii v Rossijskoj Federacii za 2013 god. URL: http://fas.gov.ru/about/list-of-reports/list-of-reports_30086.html (data obrashhenija: 12.12.2014).
15. Konsolidirovannaja finansovaja otchetnost’ OAO «Gazprom neft’». URL: http://ir.gazprom-neft.ru/news-and-reports/financial-reports/ifrs/ (data obrashhenija: 20.11.2014).
16. Konsolidirovannaja finansovaja otchetnost’ OAO «NK «Rosneft’». URL: http://www.rosneft.ru/Investors/statements_and_presentations/ (data obrashhenija: 15.11.2014).
17. Konsolidirovannaja finansovaja otchetnost’ OAO «NK Lukojl». URL: http://www.lukoil.ru/new/finreports/2014 (data obrashhenija: 23.11.2014).
18. Mery po sovershenstvovaniju konkurentnyh otnoshenij na rynkah jelektricheskoj jenergii kak osnovnoj drajver razvitija otrasli. URL: http://www.fas.gov.ru/netcat_files/231/374/h_3bf2317a094e0fc29f93650f57a6a4f3 (data obrashhenija: 12.12.2014).
19. Obzory sostojanija konkurencii na optovom rynke jelektricheskoj jenergii i moshhnosti za 2006–2011 gg., sost. FAS RF. URL: http://fas.gov.ru/analytical- materials/?action=index&sp%5B4%5D=1&text_search=&ord=1&date_beg=1&h_db=2009-09-14&date_end=1&h_de=2014-03-02&curPos=20 (data obrashhenija: 04.08.2013).
20. Porjadok provedenija analiza sostojanija konkurencii na tovarnom rynke, utverzhdennyj prikazom Federal’noj antimonopol’noj sluzhby RF ot 28 aprelja 2010 g. № 220. URL: http://www.fas.gov.ru/legislative-acts/legislative-acts_50604.html (data obrashhenija: 03.03.2015).
21. Reglamenty rynka (NORJeM), sost. NP «Sovet rynka» po organizacii jeffektivnoj sistemy optovoj i roznichnoj torgovli jelektricheskoj jenergiej i moshhnost’ju. URL: http://www.np-sr.ru/contract/joining/marketnorem/index.htm (data obrashhenija: 27.02.2014).
22. Reestr sub#ektov optovogo rynka jelektricheskoj jenergii (moshhnosti), sost. NP «Sovet rynka». URL: http://www.npsr.ru/registers/marketsubject/energyproducers/index.htm (data obrashhenija: 27.02.2017).
23. Statisticheskoe obozrenie. Stat. sb. URL: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1140076462969 (data obrashhenija: 29.11.2014).
24. Federal’nyj zakon Rossijskoj Federacii ot 26 ijulja 2006 g. № 135-FZ «O zashhite konkurencii». URL: http://base.garant.ru/12148517/ – St. 5. (data obrashhenija: 26.02.2017).
Review
For citations:
Petrov S.P. THE PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATIVE CRITERIA FOR REVEALING OF COLLECTIVE DOMINANCE ON GOODS MARKETS OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Vestnik NSUEM. 2017;(2):50-62. (In Russ.)
Email this article 
