The issues of Functioning of Housing and Utilities Services in Industrial Region, by the Example of the Sverdlovsk Region
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-3-084-093
Abstract
The article focuses on the state of housing and communal services of the industrial region, on the example of the Sverdlovsk region, in the relationship and the level and possibilities of financing of services in this area by the main consumer – the population. The comparison of regional indicators with the all-Russian trends is carried out. The study shows the need and the possibility of rapid response to the problem of the crisis state of the industry. The need is determined by the critical state of the utilities of the regional housing and communal services system. The possibility is connected with the justification of covering the costs directed to the modernization of the industry, where investors can be sure of compensation of costs, primarily due to the responsible attitude of the main consumers – the population of the region to pay for housing and communal services.
About the Author
E. N. Prokofyeva
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Prokofyeva Elena N., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Akif’eva L.V., Ozina A.M. Ocenka kachestva zhilishhno-kommunal’nyh uslug // Vestnik NGIJeI. 2016. № 4. P. 15–23.
2. Bobrovskaja N.I., Kuzina S.I. Strategii gosudarstvennoj politiki v sfere zhilishhnokommunal’nogo hozjajstva (s uchetom zarubezhnogo opyta) // Voprosy upravlenija. 2014. № 1. P. 31–37.
3. Klokov D.V. Rashody na zhilishhno-kommunal’nye uslugi v sisteme objazatel’nyh platezhej domohozjajstv // Vestnik RGGU. 2013. № 2. P. 110–120.
4. Kuprin A.A. Osnovnye napravlenija sovershenstvovanija upravlenija ZhKH i puti ih reshenija // Transportnoe delo Rossii. 2016. № 4. P. 27–30.
5. Leonova L.B. Zhilishhno-kommunal’noe hozjajstvo kak vazhnejshij indikator izmenenija kachestva zhizni naselenija // Sovremennye issledovanija social’nyh problem. 2015. № 11. P. 304–320.
6. Petrina O.A., Stadolin M.E. K voprosu o gosudarstvennom finansirovanii rekonstrukcii i modernizacii ob#ektov kommunal’noj sfery // Vestnik universiteta. 2017. № 6. P. 15–19.
7. Rjahovskaja A.N. Usilenie regulirujushhej funkcii gosudarstva v sfere ZhKH: celesoobraznost’ i neobhodimost’ // Zhilishhnoe i kommunal’noe hozjajstvo. 2017. № 4. P. 10–14.
8. Stukalova I.B., Provalenova N.V. Zarubezhnyj opyt razvitija rynka zhilishhno-kommunal’nyh uslug na osnove gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva // Vestnik NGIJeI. 2018. № 1. P. 76–88.
9. Havanova N.V., Litvinova L.V. Puti povyshenija jeffektivnosti vzyskanija zadolzhennosti s grazhdan za uslugi v sfere zhilishhno-kommunal’nogo hozjajstva // Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2015. № 2. P. 181–206.
10. Robert Osei-Kyei, Albert P.C. Chan Review of studies on the Critical of Success Factor for Pacific-Private Partnership projects from 1990 to 2013 // International Journal of project management. 2015. Vol. 33. Iss. 6. P. 1335–1346.
11. Strategija razvitija zhilishhno-kommunal’nogo hozjajstva Rossijskoj Federacii do 2020 goda. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://static.government.ru
Review
For citations:
Prokofyeva E.N. The issues of Functioning of Housing and Utilities Services in Industrial Region, by the Example of the Sverdlovsk Region. Vestnik NSUEM. 2019;(3):84-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-3-084-093
Email this article 
