Parametrical Robustness as Technological and Financial Tool for Management of Economics Systems

The relevance of the development of research on the parametrization of homeostasis as a special information structure of robust control introduced into economic systems to ensure robust stability of their activities is substantiated. The principles of designing homeostasis for managing complex open systems in a multisubjective environment filled with uncertainty are given. The experience of using homeostasis in economic theory is generalized. An approach to the design of adaptive homeostasis of an economic system that combines parameters-indicators of its activity and the state of a multisubject environment, the formation of systemic convergence is described. The composition of the indicator parameters of adaptive homeostasis is substantiated, a cognitive map is constructed.A new class of problems for ensuring robust stability of complex economic systems is derived, based on a combination of heuristic methods with numerical and simulation modeling.

design homeostasis, adaptive homeostasis, robust control mechanism, parameterization, indicator parameters, system convergence, scenario planning, business engineering

1. Adizes Ic.N. Upravlenie zhiznennym ciklom korporacii / per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2007. 384 p.

2. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V. K teorii gibkoj adaptacii jekonomicheskih sistem posredstvom robastnogo upravlenija // Fundamental’nye issledovanija. 2019. № 6. P. 7–17.

3. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V., Hrushhev S.E. Neopredelennost’ v upravlenii jekonomicheskimi sistemami: priroda, ocenki i sposoby preodolenija // Jekonomika i upravlenija. 2018. № 8. P. 14–24.

4. Bir St. Kibernetika i upravlenie proizvodstvom / per. s angl. M.: Gos. izd-vo fiz.-mat. literatury, 1963. 274 p.

5. Vasil’eva N.S. Issledovanie metodik prognozirovanija verojatnosti i vyjavlenija priznakov prednamerennogo bankrotstva organizacii // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2019. № 1. P. 450–452.

6. Veriti Dzh. Scenarnoe planirovanie kak strategicheskij instrumentarij. strategija: ucheb.posobie. Hrestomatija / per. s angl. Zhukovskij: MIM LINK, 2015. P. 118–132.

7. Vechkanov G.S., Vechkanova G.R., Puljaev V.T. Kratkaja jekonomicheskaja jenciklopedija. SPb.: TOO TE «Petropolis», 1999. 509 p.

8. Gorskij Ju.D., Stepanov A.M., Teslinov A.G. Gomeostatika: garmonija v igre protivorechij. Irkutsk: Izd-vo «Reprocentr A1», 2008. 634 p.

9. Grant R.M. Sovremennyj strategicheskij analiz / per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2008. 560 p.

10. Grushko I.M., Sidenko V.M. Osnovy nauchnyh issledovanij / 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. Har’kov: Vishha shkola, Izd-vo pri Har’k. un-te, 1983. 224 p.

11. Druker P. Jeffektivnoe upravlenie. Jekonomicheskie zadachi i optimal’nye reshenija / per. s angl. M.: FAJR-PRESS, 1998. 288 p.

12. Kovalev V.V. Finansovyj analiz: Upravlenie kapitalom. Vybor investicij. Analiz otchetnosti. M.: Finansy i statistika, 1998. 512 p.

13. Krasnjanskij G.L. Investicionnaja politika ugol’noj otrasli. M., 1999.

14. Lamben Zh.Zh. Menedzhment, orientirovannyj na rynok / per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2006. 800 p.

15. Linders M.R., Firon H.E. Upravlenie snabzheniem i zapasami. Logistika / per. s angl. SPb.: OOO «Izd-vo Poligon», 1999. 768 p.

16. Lukashov A.V. Metod Monte-Karlo dlja finansovyh analitikov: kratkij putevoditel’ // Upravlenie korporativnymi finansami. 2007. № 01 (19). P. 22–39.

17. Mak-Donal’d M. Strategicheskoe planirovanie marketinga / per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2000. 320 p.

18. Prangishvili I.V. Sistemnyj podhod i obshhesistemnye zakonomernosti. Ser. Sistemnye problemy upravlenija. M.: SINTEG, 2000. 538 p.

19. Rajan B. Strategicheskij uchet dlja rukovoditelej / per. s angl. M.: Audit, JuNITI. 1998. 616 p.

20. Rasiel I. Metod McKinsey: Ispol’zovanie tehnik vedushhih strategicheskih konsul’- tantov dlja reshenija vashih lichnyh zadach i zadach vashego biznesa / per. s angl. M.: Al’pina Biznes Buks, 2004. 194 p.

21. Stjopin V.S. Istoricheskie tipy nauchnoj racional’nosti v ih otnoshenii k probleme slozhnosti. Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. P. 37–46.

22. Frejdina E.V., Lapshova L.N. Logika ispol’zovanija modelej konceptnyh matric dlja obosnovanija strategicheskoj napravlennosti biznesa // Problemy jekonomicheskoj nauki i praktiki. Vyp. III. Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2017. P. 77–94.

23. Frejdina E.V., Nikulina N.A., Botvinnik A.A. Nasledstvennye i situativnye riski organizacionnyh sistem: predstavlenie o preemstvennosti i metody opredelenija // Upravlenie riskom. 2011. № 1. P. 32–40.

24. Sharp U., Aleksander G., Bjejli Dzh. Investicii / per. s angl. M.: INFRA-M, 1999. 1028 p.

25. Shim Dzh.K., Sigel Dzh.G. Finansovyj menedzhment / per. s angl. M.: IID «Filin#», 1999. 400 p.

26. Glinskiy V., Serga L., Alekseev M., Samotoya N., Simonova E. The Development of the Food Industry as a Condition for Improving Russia’s National Security. Procedia Manufacturing. 2018. Vol. 21. P. 838–845.

27. Hannah Kosow. The best of both worlds? An exploratory study on forms and effects of new qualitative-quantitative scenario methodologies. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart. 2016. 340 p.

28. Van Notten P.W.F., Rotmans J., Van Asselt MBA, Rothman D.S. An updated scenario typology, Futures. 2003. 35 (5). P. 423–443.