The Link Between Innovation Process Performance and Technological Innovation Costs in Russian Industries
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2020-2-138-159
Abstract
About the Author
S. P. PetrovRussian Federation
Petrov Sergey P., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Theory and Applied Economics
Novosibirsk
References
1. Golichenko O.G. Rossijskaja innovacionnaja sistema: problemy razvitija // Voprosy jekonomiki. 2004. № 12. P. 16–34. doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2004-12-16-34.
2. Indikatory innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti: 2008: statisticheskij sbornik / Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». M.: NIU VShJe, 2008. 424 p.
3. Indikatory innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti: 2010: statisticheskij sbornik / Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». M.: NIU VShJe, 2010. 728 p.
4. Indikatory innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti: 2012: statisticheskij sbornik / Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». M.: NIU VShJe, 2012. 472 p.
5. Indikatory innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti: 2014: statisticheskij sbornik / Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». M.: NIU VShJe, 2014. 472 p.
6. Indikatory innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti: 2016: statisticheskij sbornik / Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». M.: NIU VShJe, 2016. 320 p.
7. Indikatory innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti: 2018: statisticheskij sbornik / Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». M.: NIU VShJe, 2018. 344 p.
8. Kaz’min A.A. Innovacionnaja aktivnost’ firm i intensivnost’ konkurencii: uchet faktora tehnologicheskogo urovnja sektorov jekonomiki: dis. ... kand. jekon. nauk: 08.00.05. SPb., 2016. 217 p.
9. Kozlov K.K., Sokolov D.G., Judaeva K.V. Innovacionnaja aktivnost’ rossijskih firm // Jekonomicheskij zhurnal VShJe. 2004. № 3. P. 399–419.
10. Mir perevorachivaetsja na nashih glazah // Jekspert. 2019. № 49 (1144). P. 11.
11. Ovchinnikova A.V. Analiz vlijanija struktury rynka na innovacionnuju dejatel’nost’ // Vestnik JuUrGU. Serija «Jekonomika i menedzhment». 2013. T. 7. № 2. P. 86–94.
12. Pahomova N.V., Kaz’min A.A. Struktura rynka, tehnologicheskie vozmozhnosti i innovacionnaja aktivnost’: chto vazhno uchest’ pri modernizacii konkurentnoj politiki // Problemy sovremennoj jekonomiki. 2009. № 2 (30). P. 111–115.
13. Pahomova N.V., Rihter K.K. Jekonomika otraslevyh rynkov i politika gosudarstva. M.: ZAO «Izdatel’stvo «Jekonomika», 2009. 815 p.
14. Porot’kin E.S. Rezul’tativnost’ innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti neftegazodobyvajushhih kompanij s gosudarstvennym uchastiem // Vestnik Samarskogo municipal’nogo instituta upravlenija. 2018. № 3. P. 55–66.
15. Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik. 2017: Stat. sb. / Rosstat. M., 2017. 686 p.
16. Sumina E.V. Novyj podhod k ocenke rezul’tativnosti innovacionnogo razvitija na osnove sravnitel’nogo analiza regionov po dinamicheskim pokazateljam innovacionnyh izmenenij // Journal of Creative Economy. 2018. T. 12. № 11. P. 1781–1806.
17. Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V. Innovacii i proizvoditel’nost’ rossijskih promyshlennyh kompanij // Innovacii. 2017. № 4 (222). P. 53–65.
18. Shumpeter J.A. Kapitalizm, Socializm i Demokratija. M.: Jekonomika, 1995. 540 p.
19. Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P. Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2005. Vol. 120. № 2. P. 701–728.
20. Bound J., Cummins C., Griliches Z., Hall B.H., Jaffe A. Who Does R&D and Who Patents? NBER Working Paper Series. 1982. № 908. 57 p.
21. Denison E.F. Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929–1982. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 1985. 141 p.
22. Dong-Soo L. A Study of Firm Size and Technology Innovation. Journal of Economic Research. 1999. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 61–85.
23. Evans D.S. The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 1987. Vol. 35. № 4. The Empirical Renaissance in Industrial Economics. P. 567–581. doi: 10.2307/2098588.
24. Kalay F., Lynn G.S. The Impact of Strategic Innovation Management Practices on Firm Innovation Performance. Research Journal of Business & Management – RJBM. 2014. Vol. 2 (3). P. 412–429.
25. Karlsson C., Tavassoli S. Innovation strategies and firm performance. Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies Working Paper Series. 2015. 401.
26. Rajapathirana R.P.J., Hui Y. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2018. 3. P. 44–55.
27. Savrul M., Incekara A. The Effect of R&D Intensity on Innovation Performance: A Country Level Evaluation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. 210. P. 388–396. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.386.
28. Minpromtorg Rossii: dolja ispol’zuemyh vo vtorichnom proizvodstve othodov proizvodstva i potreblenija dolzhna byt’ uvelichena. [Jelektronnyj resurs] / GARANT.RU. URL: http://www.garant.ru/news/1189781/#ixzz6Hx6TB5kG (data obrashhenija: 28.03. 2020).
29. Pasport nacional’nogo proekta «Proizvoditel’nost’ truda i podderzhka zanjatosti» / Sajt Pravitel’stva RF. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://government.ru/info/35567/ (data obrashhenija: 29.01.2020).
30. Strategija nauchno-tehnicheskogo razvitija Rossijskoj Federacii, utverzhdennaja ukazom Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii ot 1 dekabrja 2016 g. № 642. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449 (data obrashhenija: 12.04.2019).
Review
For citations:
Petrov S.P. The Link Between Innovation Process Performance and Technological Innovation Costs in Russian Industries. Vestnik NSUEM. 2020;(2):138-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2020-2-138-159