«COMPLЕXITY» AND «PERPLEXITY» – CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT OF GOVERNANCE SYSTEMS

Addressing the issue of «complexity» and «perplexity» categories is caused by the evolution of system types ranging from well-organized to self-organizing, expanding the horizons of scientific rationality. Development of governance systems is revealed through the dichotomy of properties and restrictions within the «organizational set-up» and «external influence»  notions. It was shown that the governance system falls into the category of complexity because the system is operating on the edge of «order and chaos». External environment is presented as chaos analogue showing uncertainty and changes of various fluctuation category, up to turbulence. The incorporation of social and economic system into external environment was considered from the perspective of formation of «system convergence» of two open systems, contributing to growth of the degree of complexity of governance system. It was emphasized that business development forces  perplexity governance systems to switch to robust control; the mechanism of robust control is organized under the influence of the laws of evolution and survivability of biosystems. The following methods were marked out and justified: selection of parameters for system convergence of governance system with external environment entities, determination of limits of information granules of adaptive and robust homeostasis, scenario planning, construction of convergent strategy and temporal attractor of system equilibrium state, known as «floating equilibrium». These methods are to be mastered by the governance system within robust control. 

1. Alekseev M.A. Informacionnoe prostranstvo finansovogo rynka: monogr. Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2017. 247 p.

2. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V. K teorii gibkoj adaptacii jekonomicheskih sistem posredstvom robastnogo upravlenija // Fundamental’nye issledovanija. 2019. № 6. P. 7–17.

3. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V., Hrushhev S.E. Neopredelennost’ v upravlenii jekonomicheskimi sistemami: priroda, ocenki i sposoby preodolenija // Jekonomika i upravlenie. 2018. № 8. P. 14–24.

4. Arshinov V.I., Svirskij Ja.I. Slozhnostnyj mir i ego nabljudatel’. Chast’ pervaja // Filosofija nauki i tehniki. 2015. T. 20. № 2. P. 70–84.

5. Barker Dzh. Paradigmy myshlenija: kak uvidet’ novoe i preuspet’ v menjajushhemsja mire / per. s angl. M.: Al’pina Biznes Buks, 2007. 187 p.

6. Bir St. Kibernetika i upravlenie proizvodstvom / per. s angl. M.: Gos. izd-vo fizikomatematicheskaja literatura, 1963. 274 p.

7. Budanov V.G., Arshinov V.I., Svirskij Ja.I., Lepskij V.E. Slozhnost’ i problemy edinstva znanij. Vyp. 1. K strategii poznanija slozhnosti. M.: IF RAN, 2018. 105 p.

8. Veriti Dzh. Scenarnoe planirovanie kak strategicheskij instrumentarij. Strategija: ucheb. posobie. Hrestomatija / per. s angl. Zhukovskij: MIM LINK, 2015. P. 118–132.

9. Vojcehovskij V.Je. Mezhdu prostotoj i slozhnost’ju // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. P. 286–299.

10. Gibson Dzh., Ivancevich D., Donnelli D. Organizacija: povedenie, struktura, processy / per. s angl. M.: INFRA-M, 2000.

11. Glejk Dzh. Haos. Sozdanie novoj nauki / per. s angl. Penguin books, 1988. 354 p.

12. Glinskij V.V. Statisticheskie metody podderzhki upravlencheskih reshenij. Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2008. 256 p.

13. Druker P. Jeffektivnoe upravlenie. Jekonomicheskie zadachi i optimal’nye reshenija / per. s angl. M.: FA JR-PRESS, 1998. 288 p.

14. Lepskij V.E. Jevoljucija predstavlenij ob upravlenii (metodologicheskij i filosofskij analiz). M.: Kogito-Centr, 2015. 107 p.

15. Lukashov A.V. Metod Monte-Karlo dlja finansovyh analitikov: kratkij putevoditel’ // Upravlenie korporativnymi finansami. 2007. № 1 (19). P. 22–39.

16. Majncer K. Vyzovy slozhnosti v XXI veke // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. P. 14–37.

17. Mincberg G. Struktura v kulake: sozdanie jeffektivnoj organizacii / per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2001. 512 p.

18. Nalimov V.V. Planirovanie jeksperimenta. M.: Nauka, 1974. 156 p.

19. Nort D. Ponimanie processa jekonomicheskih izmenenij / per. s angl. M.: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 2010. 256 p.

20. Parsons T. O strukture social’nogo dejstvija. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2000. 880 p.

21. Prangishvili I.V. Sistemnyj podhod i obshhesistemnye zakonomernosti. Serija «Sistemnye problemy upravlenija». M.: SINTEG, 2000. 538 p.

22. Rautian A.S. Buket zakonov jevoljucii // Jevoljucija biosfery i bioraznoobrazija. K 70-letiju A.Ju. Rozanova. M.: KMK, 2006. P. 20–38.

23. Rejnor M. Strategicheskij paradoks / per. s angl. M.: Izd-vo «Jurajt», 2009. 399 p.

24. Romanov V.A. Slozhnost’ innovacionnyh transformacij // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. P. 341–351.

25. Svirskij Ja.I. Innovacii i slozhnostnoe myshlenie // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. P. 300–312.

26. Senge P. Pjataja disciplina: iskusstvo i praktika samoobuchajushhejsja organizacii / per. s angl. M.: Izd-vo: «Olimp-biznes», 1999. 452 p.

27. Stepin V.S. Istoricheskie tipy nauchnoj racional’nosti v ih otnoshenii k probleme slozhnosti // Sinergeticheskaja paradigma. Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti. M.: Progress-Tradicija, 2011. P. 37–46.

28. Uil’jamson O.I. Jekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaja » kontraktacija / per. s angl. SPb.: Lenizdat; CEVPress, 1996. 702 p.

29. Fajol’ A. Issledovateli ob organizacijah. Hrestomatija / per. s angl. Zhukovskij: MCDO «LINK». 1997. P. 103–109.

30. Frik P.G. Turbulentnost’: modeli i podhody. Kurs lekcij. Ch. I. Perm’: PGTU, 1998. 108 p.

31. Hannah Kosow. The best of both worlds? An exploratory study on forms and effects of new qualitative-quantitative scenario methodologies. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart, 2016. 340 p.

32. March J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991, 2, 71–87.