INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION OF US STATES AND REGIONS IN INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2021-1-221-234
Abstract
The functioning of regional innovation systems at the level of states and regions of the United States, in addition to internal factors of development, is characterized by the strengthening of trends in international cooperation in innovation. Using the possibilities of quantitative and qualitative assessment of the innovative activity of regional systems based on the calculation of integral indicators that determine the level of development of this cooperation, as well as the method of cluster analysis, a study of the leading states and regions of the country was carried out according to a specific algorithm. A grouping of the most successful states in the development of international innovation is carried out, an assessment of their spatial position within the statistical and economic regions of the United States is given, and trends in the development of international innovative cooperation for the period 2000–2019 are substantiated. at the regional level. The results obtained allow us to conclude that there are significant opportunities for international cooperation, both realized over the two investigated decades, and potential, at the level of individual states and most regions of the United States in the innovation sphere, given the huge potential of the country’s economy.
About the Author
V. N. Minat
Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P.A. Kostycheva
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor
of the Department of Economics and Management
Ryazan
References
1. Borisov V.N., Pochukaeva O.V. Metod ocenivanija processa importozameshhenija na rossijskom rynke investicionnogo oborudovanija i ego statisticheskoe obespechenie // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2019. № 3. P. 94–108. Doi: 10.34020/2073-6495-2019-3-094-108
2. Glinskij V.V., Serga L.K., Kisel’nikov A.A., Hramcova T.G. O napravlenijah vozdejstvija territorial’noj differenciacii na jekonomicheskij rost // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2018. № 4. P. 64–71.
3. Zajkov K.A. K voprosu ocenki urovnja innovacionnogo potenciala sub#ektov Rossijskoj Federacii // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2019. № 1. P. 134–151.
4. Kuz’min I.V., Gubanova E.S. Metodika ocenki mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva regionov v innovacionnoj dejatel’nosti // Problemy razvitija territorii. 2016. Vyp. 1 (81). P. 189–201.
5. Minat V.N. Migracii nauchnyh rabotnikov vysshej kvalifikacii v SShA // Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovanija. 2020. T. 14. № 3. P. 182–188. Doi: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2020.14.3.22
6. Minat V.N. Osobennosti funkcionirovanija regional’nyh innovacionnyh sistem v shtatah Severa SShA // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2020. № 3. P. 198–213. Doi: 10.34020/2073-6495-2020-3-198-213
7. Minat V.N. Tipy territorial’nyh form nacional’noj innovacionnoj sistemy SShA i ih koncentracija v gorodskih aglomeracijah // Innovacii. 2020. № 5 (259). P. 68–80. Doi: 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.259.5.010
8. Minat V.N. Federal’noe finansirovanie nauchnyh issledovanij i razrabotok v SShA: ob#em, struktura, perspektivnye napravlenija // Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Ser.: Jekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo. 2020. T. 20. Vyp. 3. P. 256–265. Doi: 10.18500/1994-2540-2020-20-3-256-265
9. Minat V.N., Chepik A.G. Vneshnetorgovye otnoshenija i innovacionnaja dejatel’nost’ SShA // Mezhdunarodnaja torgovlja i torgovaja politika. 2020. T. 6. № 2 (22). P. 5–21. Doi: 10.21686/2410-7395-2020-2-5-21
10. Minat V.N., Chepik A.G. Immigracija uchenyh i inzhenerov v SShA za poslednie 20 let: osnovnye tendencii poljarizacii migracionnogo potoka // Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. № 2 (436). Jekonomicheskie nauki. Vyp. 68. P. 162–173. Doi: 10.24411/1994-2796-2020-10216
11. Minat V.N., Chepik A.G. Sovremennye osobennosti raspredelenija, ispol’zovanija i razmeshhenija nauchnogo personala v SShA // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2020. № 2. P. 198–212. Doi: 10.34020/2073-6495-2020-2-198-212
12. Ruban D.A. Dinamika innovacionnoj aktivnosti v rossijskih regionah: opyt tipizacii // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2017. № 1. P. 26–39.
13. Spicyn V.V. Istochniki rosta i territorial’noe razmeshhenie vysokotehnologichnyh otraslej v Rossii // Vestnik NGUJeU. 2019. № 2. P. 55–70. Doi: 10.34020/2073-6495-2019-2-055-070
14. Lobesk S.A. Concentration of US high-tech industries and innovative technology complexes in the US metropolitan systems // The American Economic Review. 2018. Vol. 108. № 2. P. 783–895.
15. Raisz F. Economic Growth in American Areas. Polarization of the country’s innovative potential // The American Economic Review. 2016. Vol. 106. № 5. P. 268–290.
16. Smich A.P. Types of American States in Innovation // The American Economic Review. 2017. Vol. 107. № 8. P. 2324–2336.
17. A merican science in numbers and commentary: Statistical indicators, national and regional studies, forecasts, Wash., 2020. Jelektronnyj resurs. URL: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ (data obrashhenija: 02.10.2020).
18. N ational Science Foundation. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indictors, 2020. Jelektronnyj resurs. URL: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb2020 (data obrashhenija: 02.10.2020).
19. R esearch and Development: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons. Jelektronnyj resurs. URL: https://www.statistics/report/sections/research-and-development-us-trends-and-international-comparisons/recent-trends-in-u-s-r-d-performance (data obrashhenija: 02.10.2020).
20. World indicators of scientific research and engineering development: 2020. Jelektronnyj resurs. URL: https://www.battelle.org/aboutus/rd/2020.pdf (data obrashhenija: 02.10.2020).
Review
For citations:
Minat V.N. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION OF US STATES AND REGIONS IN INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES. Vestnik NSUEM. 2021;(1):221-234. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2021-1-221-234
Email this article 
