PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE VERSUS DISTANCE LEARNING
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2021-1-277-283
Abstract
The modern educational process is focused on the training of a specialist who is able to think critically and creatively solve problematic situations, constantly raising the level of his education. Education as the most important social institution reacts sharply to the processes taking place in society. Actively developing distance learning is quite popular today, but there are different kinds of questions related to its implementation and the significance of a personal example, personal contacts in the learning process is one of the questions that is analyzed in this article. Would the distance learning be complete if it was deprived of subjectivity by definition? The educational system is understood to be a tradition in the article. The authors stress two types of traditions: verbalized and non-verbalized. The specificity of pedagogical activity does not allow many of its significant components to be explicated. The attention is focused on non-verbalized traditions existing in the form of implicit knowledge. Specific examples (V.I. Vernadsky, V.V. Dokuchaev, P.V. Ototsky) reveal the necessity of personal knowledge in the educational process. The article concludes that personal communication between the lecturer and the student is necessary as a conscious movement against deindividuation in modern society.
About the Authors
N. P. SukhanovaRussian Federation
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Humanities
Novosibirsk
I. S. Rodicheva
Russian Federation
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Humanities
Novosibirsk
References
1. Bodrijjar Zh. Simuljakry i simuljacija / per. s fr. A. Kachalova. M.: Postum, 2015. 240 p.
2. Vernadskij V.I. O nauke. T. 1: Nauchnoe znanie. Nauchnoe tvorchestvo. Nauchnaja mysl’. Dubna: Feniks, 1997. 576 p.
3. Vitgenshtejn L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat. M.: Izd-vo AST, 2018. 160 p.
4. Dokuchaev V.V. Dorozhe zolota russkij chernozem. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1994. 544 p.
5. Donskih O.A. Novaja normal’nost’? // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2020. T. 29. № 10. P. 56–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-56-64.
6. Dudnik S.I., Markov B.V. Krizis obrazovanija v cifrovuju jepohu // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofija i konfliktologija. 2020. T. 36. Vyp. 2. P. 214–226. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.201.
7. Kasavin I.T. Znanie i ego social’noe soderzhanie: k sovremennym diskussijam na Zapade // Voprosy filosofii. 1998. № 3. P. 130–139.
8. Ortega-i-Gasset X. «Degumanizacija iskusstva» i drugie raboty. Jesse o literature i iskusstve. Sbornik. M.: Raduga, 1991. 639 p.
9. Platon. Dialogi [Tekst]: perevod s drevnegrecheskogo. M.: Izd-vo «Je», 2016. 766 p.
10. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. Na puti k postkriticheskoj filosofii. M.: «Progress», 1985. 344 p.
11. Rozov M.A. Tradicii i novacii v razvitii nauki // Filosofija i metodologija nauki: Ucheb. posobie dlja studentov vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij / pod red. V.I. Kupcova. M.: Aspekt Press, 1996. 551 p.
12. Rodicheva I.S., Suhanova N.P. Genezis idei obshhestvennogo progressa v istorikofilosofskoj mysli // Problemy sovremennogo obrazovanija. 2020. № 1. P. 9–15. DOI: 10.31862/2218-8711-2020-1-9-15.
13. Suhanova N.P. Nauchnaja shkola v vuze: professional’noe stanovlenie issledovatelja // Nauka i shkola. 2020. № 2. P. 39–45. DOI: 10.31862/1819-463X-2020-2-39-45.
14. McLuhan M. The Gutenberg Galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962. 293 p.
Review
For citations:
Sukhanova N.P., Rodicheva I.S. PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE VERSUS DISTANCE LEARNING. Vestnik NSUEM. 2021;(1):277-283. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2021-1-277-283