Market equilibrium in interregional trade models under monopolistic competition
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2022-3-183-203
Abstract
We study a homogeneous model of interregional trade under monopolistic competition of producers with additively separable utility and linear production costs. The mass of firms (“the length of the product line”) is determined endogenously, from conditions of free entry. We obtain the local comparative statics of the market equilibrium with respect to transport costs of “iceberg types”. Particular attention is paid to situations of free trade and autarky. We establish the following counter-intuitive result: under high transport costs, trade liberalization can decrease public welfare.
About the Authors
I. A. BykadorovRussian Federation
Bykadorov Igor A. – Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Business Analytics and Statistics,
Novosibirsk
Yu. N. Ismaiylova
Russian Federation
Ismaiylova Yuliya N. – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Business Analytics and Statistics
Novosibirsk
M. V. Pudova
Russian Federation
Pudova Marina V. – Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Business Analytics and Statistics
Novosibirsk
References
1. Bykadorov I.A., Ismajylova Ju.N., Pudova M.V., Hrushhev S.E. Obshhestvennaja optimal’nost’ v modeljah mezhregional’noj torgovli [Social optimality in interregional trade models], Vestnik NGUJeU [Vestnik NSUEM], 2022, no. 3, pp. 10–25.
2. Arkolakis C., Costinot A., Donaldson D., Rodreguez-Clare A. The Elusive Pro-Competitive Effects of Trade // The Review of Economic Studies. 2019. Vol. 86. P. 46–80.
3. Arkolakis C., Costinot A., Rodreguez-Clare A. New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? // American Economic Review. 2012. Vol. 102. P. 94–130.
4. Behrens K., Murata Y. General Equilibrium Models of Monopolistic Competition: a New Approach // Journal of Economic Theory. 2007. Vol. 136. P. 776–787.
5. Belyaev I., Bykadorov I. Dixit–Stiglitz–Krugman Model with Nonlinear Costs // Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2020. Vol. 12095. P. 157–169.
6. Chamberlin E.H. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: A Re-Orientation of the Theory of Value. 1st. ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1933.
7. Dixit A.K., Stiglitz J.E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity // American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67. No. 3. P. 297–308.
8. Krugman P.R. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade // Journal of International Economics. 1979. Vol. 9. P. 469–479.
9. Krugman P.R. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade // American Economic Review. 1980. Vol. 70. P. 950–959.
10. Melitz M.J., Redding S.J. Missing Gains from Trade? // American Economic Review. 2014. Vol. 104. No. 5. P. 317–321.
11. Melitz M.J., Redding S.J. New Trade Models, New Welfare Implications // American Economic Review. 2015. Vol. 105. No. 3. P. 1105–1146.
12. Kokovin S., Molchanov P., Bykadorov I. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade: Revisiting Gains from Trade // Journal of International Economics. 2022. Vol. 137. P. 103595.
13. Zhelobodko E., Kokovin S., Parenti M., Thisse J.-F. Monopolistic competition in general equilibrium: Beyond the Constant Elasticity of Substitution // Econometrica. 2012. Vol. 80. No. 6. P. 2765–2784.
Review
For citations:
Bykadorov I.A., Ismaiylova Yu.N., Pudova M.V. Market equilibrium in interregional trade models under monopolistic competition. Vestnik NSUEM. 2022;(3):183-203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2022-3-183-203