Typology of adaptation of complexity socio-economic systems in terms of organismic approach
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2023-1-184-205
Abstract
The sustainable development of socio-economic systems, of any class of complexity and principally unstable due to acceleration of changes, growth of uncertainty, turbulent manifestations and chaos in the external environment, is a dominant paradigm of modern times. The initial point contains explicit contradictions and the scientific world drew a conclusion: the survival and development of socio-economic systems in the established conditions would require the transition of their activity to the mode of daily adaptation to complicated reality. The article offers the notion of adaptation as a necessary, directed change, which provides sustainability, growth and development of the system within the reached norm of reaction and through compensation effect. It was shown that the changes are diverse and it leads to a variety of adaptation actions and a need for their typological grouping.
In accordance with the laws of evolution, adaptation is a universal property of biological systems which allows them to enter a sustainable state, grow and develop in time and space. The organismic approach was added to the research of socio-economic systems because of the search for isomorphism in adaptive actions of the two systems of different nature. The goal lies in the revelation of capabilities to adaptation of biological systems and their typology, as well as in the porting of accumulated knowledge to the theory of adaptation of socio-economic systems. The article presents the typologies of adaptation of complexity (network, system integration, business ecosystems) systems, built on two metatypes of adaptation: systematic – genotypical alike, environmental – phenotypical alike.
About the Authors
M. A. Alekseev
Siberian Institute of Management – Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alekseev Mikhail A. – Doctor of Economics, Leading Researcher of the Research Laboratory “Sustainable Development of Socio-Economic Systems”, Professor of the Department of Business Analytics and Statistics
Novosibirsk
E. V. Freydina
Siberian Institute of Management – Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Freydina Elizaveta V. – Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher of the Research Laboratory “Sustainable Development of Socio-Economic Systems”
Novosibirsk
L. K. Serga
Siberian Institute of Management – Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Serga Lyudmila K. – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Business Analytics and Statistics, Siberian Institute of Management –
Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Associate Professor of the Department of Statistics, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Novosibirsk
References
1. Alekseev M.A., Zajkov K.A., Frejdina E.V. Organizmennyj podhod k razvitiju teorii adaptacii social’no-jekonomicheskih sistem [Organismic Approach to the Development of the Theory of Adaptation of Socio-Economic Systems], Jekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and Management], 2022, no. 3, pp. 226–240.
2. Alekseev M.A., Frejdina E.V., Hrushhev S.E. Upravlenie slozhnymi sistemami: predely i preobrazovanie informacii v povedenie [Management of complex systems: limits and transformation of information into behavior], Razvitie territorij [Territory Development], 2021, no. 1 (23), pp. 21–30.
3. Anohin P.K. Ocherki po fiziologii funkcional’nyh system [Essays on the physiology of functional systems]. Moscow, Medicina, 1975. 477 p.
4. Bertalanfi L.K. Obshhaja teorija sistem – obzor problem i rezul’tatov [General Systems Theory – A Review of Problems and Results]. Sistemnye issledovanija [System Research]. Ezhegodnik. Moscow, Nauka, 1969. Pp. 30–54.
5. Bir St. Mozg firmy [The brain of the firm]. Moscow, Izd-vo «Radio i svjaz’», 1993. 416 p.
6. Budanov V.G., Arshinov V.I., Svirskij Ja.I., Lepskij V.E. Slozhnost’ i problemy edinstva znanij [Complexity and problems of the unity of knowledge]. Vyp. 1. K strategii poznanija slozhnosti [Issue 1. Toward a strategy for understanding complexity]. Moscow, IF RAN, 2018. 105 p.
7. Kamenskij A.A., Krikunov E.A., Pasechnik V.V. Obshhaja biologija: 10–11 klass [General biology: grades 10–11]. Moscow, Drofa, 2005.
8. Klejner G.B. Jekonomika jekosistem: shag v budushhee [Economics of ecosystems: a step into the future], Jekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic revival of Russia], 2019, no. 1 (59), pp. 40–52.
9. Kondrat’ev N.D. Krizisy i prognozy v svete teorii dlinnyh voln. Vzgljad iz sovremennosti [Crises and forecasts in the light of the theory of long waves. A look from the present]. Pod red. L.E. Grinina, A.V. Korotaeva, V.M. Bondarenko. Moscow, Mosk. red. izd-va «Uchitel’», 2017. 384 p.
10. Kuznecov S.B., Zerdzinski S. Ocenka granicy vozniknovenija neustojchivosti jekonomiki [Evaluation of the boundary of the emergence of economic instability], Razvitie territorij [Territory Development], 2022, no. 4 (30), pp. 17–23.
11. Lefevr V.A. O samoorganizujushhihsja i samorefleksivnyh sistemah [On self-organizing and self-reflexive systems], Refleksivnye processy i upravlenie [Reflexive processes and management], 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–35.
12. Marfenin N.N. Koncepcija modul’noj organizacii v razvitii [The concept of modular organization in development], Zhurnal obshhej biologii [Journal of General Biology], 1999, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 6–17.
13. Minakov V.F. Informacionnye processy v formirovanii azhiotazhnyh ciklov [Information processes in the formation of hype cycles], Razvitie territorij [Territory Development], 2021, no. 2 (24), pp. 76–82.
14. Mincberg G. Struktura v kulake: sozdanie jeffektivnoj organizacii [Structure in a fist: creation of an effective organization]. Per. s angl. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2001. 512 p.
15. Mirkin B.M., Naumova L.G. Osnovy obshhej jekologii [Fundamentals of general ecology]. Uchebnoe posobie. Moscow, Universitetskaja kniga, 2005. P. 240.
16. Moiseev N.N. Algoritmy razvitija [Development algorithms]. Moscow, Nauka, 1987. 304 p.
17. Ozhegov P.S. Slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Russkij jazyk, 1989. 922 p.
18. Oleskin A.V. Setevye struktury v biosistemah [Network structures in biosystems], Zhurnal obshhej biologii [Journal of General Biology], 2013, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 112–138.
19. Rautian A.S. Buket zakonov jevoljucii [Bouquet of laws of evolution], Jevoljucija biosfery i bioraznoobrazija [Evolution of the biosphere and biodiversity]. K 70-letiju A.Ju. Rozanova. Moscow, KMK, 2006. Pp. 20–38.
20. Rejmers N.F. Prirodopol’zovanie: slovar’ – spravochnik [Nature management: dictionary – reference book]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1990. 637 p.
21. Rejnor M. Strategicheskij paradoks [Strategic paradox]. Per. s angl. Moscow, Jurajt, 2009. 399 p.
22. Svirskij Ja.I. Innovacii i slozhnostnoe myshlenie. Sinergeticheskaja paradigma [Innovations and complex thinking. Synergetic paradigm], Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti [Synergetics of innovative complexity]. Moscow, Progress-Tradicija, 2011. Pp. 300–312.
23. Stjopin V.S. Istoricheskie tipy nauchnoj racional’nosti v ih otnoshenii k probleme slozhnosti. Sinergeticheskaja paradigma [Historical types of scientific rationality in their relation to the problem of complexity. Synergetic paradigm], Sinergetika innovacionnoj slozhnosti [Synergetics of innovation complexity]. Moscow, Progress-Tradicija, 2011. Pp. 37–46.
24. Toffler Je. Shok budushhego [Future shock]. Per. s angl. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo ACT, 2002. 557 p.
25. Frejdina E.V. Issledovanie sistem upravlenii [Research of control systems]: ucheb. posobie po special’nosti «Menedzhment organizacii». Pod red. Ju.V. Guseva; 7-e izd., ster. Moscow, Omega-L, 2014. 368 p.
26. Hjendi Ch. Vremja bezrassudstva [Time of recklessness]. Per. s angl. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2001. 288 p.
27. Moore J.F. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review. 1993, May/June. P. 75–86.
28. Filosofskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ (2010) [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary (2010)]. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy (accessed: 01.02.2023).
29. Reeves M., Levin S., Ueda D. Think Biologically: Messy Management fora Complex World, 18 July, 2017. Available at: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/think-biologically-messy-management-for-complex-world.aspx (accessed: 08.07.2019).
Review
For citations:
Alekseev M.A., Freydina E.V., Serga L.K. Typology of adaptation of complexity socio-economic systems in terms of organismic approach. Vestnik NSUEM. 2023;(1):184-205. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2023-1-184-205
Email this article 
