Analysis of foreign experience in the implementation of import substitution policy and management
https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2023-3-055-062
Abstract
The import substitution model is not new for our country, the first practices were carried out in Soviet times. Nowadays, there is a tendency to restrict export-import relations. Protective measures are being introduced that break down existing logistics chains, which increases the risks of entire industries in the Russian Federation by a multiple. Directly, the problem of import substitution has become very acute for the Russian Federation in the light of unprecedented sanctions pressure from Western countries, which has been observed since the beginning of 2022. However, many countries in one way or another faced the need to introduce import substitution policy tools. Therefore, in order to respond in a timely manner to the external challenges facing our country, it is necessary to analyze foreign experience in localization of production. This article is devoted to the consideration of import substitution practices of different countries in order to establish positive and negative mechanisms for the implementation of import substitution policy. The purpose of this study is to identify mechanisms that can ensure the effectiveness of industrial development programs.
About the Authors
L. P. GoncharenkoRussian Federation
Goncharenko Lyudmila P. – Doctor of Economics, Professor
Moscow
G. G. Korsakov
Russian Federation
Korsakov Grigory G. – Postgraduate Student
Moscow
References
1. Bajnov V.A. Zarubezhnyj opyt provedenija politiki importozameshhenija [Foreign experience of the policy of import substitution], Mir novoj jekonomiki [The world of the new economy], 2018, no. 12 (2), pp. 122–128.
2. Importozameshhenie v rossijskoj jekonomike: faktory uspeshnosti [Import Substitution in the Russian Economy: Success Factors]. Centr issledovanij strukturnoj politiki NIU VShJe, 03.2023, pp. 2–5.
3. Analiz investicionnoj privlekatel’nosti V’etnama [Analysis of Vietnam’s investment attractiveness], 08.2022. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://duan.asia/ru/art/manufacture (accessed: 12.03.2023).
4. Zudin N.N., Kuzyk M.G., Simachev Ju.V. Zarubezhnyj opyt provedenija politiki importozameshhenija: na kogo ravnjat’sja? [Foreign experience of the policy of import substitution: who to look up to?], Rossija: tendencii i perspektivy razvitija [Russia: trends and prospects of development], 2016, no. 11-3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zarubezhnyy-opyt-provedeniya-politiki-importozamescheniya-na-kogoravnyatsya (accessed: 12.03.2023).
5. Pochemu v mire tak malo istorij uspeshnogo importozameshhenija [Why there are so few stories of successful import substitution in the world], 03.2022. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://guru.nes.ru/pochemu-v-mire-malo-istorij-uspeshnogo-importozameshheniya.html (accessed: 14.03.2023).
6. Titova O.V., Voskanjan N.A. Importozameshhenie: ponjatie, sushhnost’, osobennosti [Import substitution: concept, essence, features], Innovacionnaja jekonomika: perspektivy razvitija i sovershenstvovanija [Innovative economy: prospects for development and improvement], 2021, no. 7 (57). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/importozameschenie-ponyatie-suschnost-osobennosti (accessed: 12.03.2023).
7. Torgovye otnoshenija SShA i KNR. Torgovoe predstavitel’stvo Pravitel’stva SShA [Trade relations between the USA and China. Trade representation of the US Government]. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/chinamongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china (accessed: 15.03.2023).
Review
For citations:
Goncharenko L.P., Korsakov G.G. Analysis of foreign experience in the implementation of import substitution policy and management. Vestnik NSUEM. 2023;(3):55–62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2023-3-055-062