METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES OF GENERATION AND USE OF COEFFICIENTS OF ACCRUALS
Abstract
The article considers the methodological issues of assessment (measurement) of the degree of divergence of financial results of activity of company, formed by accrual method and cash method. The paper suggests using charge coefficient as the key indicator determining the degree of manipulation of profit. Since the charge coefficient is a key element in various models of assessment of reliability of financial reporting, the methodological approach, offered in the article, opens possibilities of modification of the existing models for the purpose of stratification of financial reports not only by reliability level, but also by groups of persons, making the decision on their basis. Depending on the involvement of various groups of stakeholders into the process of distribution of the financial result, obtained from functioning of the company, the authors offered modification of the charge coefficient in the context of assessment of quality of profit for the widest range of stakeholders, for owners of borrowed funds and shareholders and only for shareholders. Development of the offered methodical approach will make it possible to investigate interrelations between reliability of the submitted reporting of the companies and costs of attraction of share and borrowed capital.
About the Authors
M. A. Alekseev
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Alekseev Mikhail A., PhD in Economics, Head of the Department of Finance
Russian Federation
Alekseev Mikhail A., PhD in Economics, Head of the Department of Finance
M. Yu. Savelyeva
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
Russian Federation
Savelyeva Marina Yu., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Finance
Russian Federation
Savelyeva Marina Yu., PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Finance
References
1. Alekseev M.A. Problemy primenenija pokazatelja manipulirovanija k finansovoj otchetnosti rossijskih predprijatij // My prodolzhaem tradicii rossijskoj statistiki: Materialy I Otkrytogo rossijskogo statisticheskogo kongressa (Novosibirsk, 20–22 oktjabrja 2015 goda). Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2015. P. 578–579.
2. Alekseev M.A., Djadenko G.V. Postroenie raspredelenija ceny bazovogo aktiva na primere obyknovennyh akcij RAO «EJeS Rossii» // Sibirskaja finansovaja shkola. 2004. № 4 (53). P. 49–52.
3. Volkov D.L.Teorija cennostno-orientirovannogo menedzhmenta: finansovyj i buhgalterskij aspekty / 2-e izd.; Sankt-Peterburgskij gos. un-t, Vyssh. shk. menedzhmenta. Sankt-Peterburg, 2008. 320 p
4. Glinskij V.V., Serga L.K., Chemezova E.Ju., Zajkov K.A. Ob ocenke porogovyh znachenij v reshenii zadachi klassifikacii dannyh // Voprosy statistiki. 2014. № 12. P. 30–36.
5. Korol'kova M.V. Izuchenija vozmozhnosti primenenija modeli M-score k finansovoj otchetnosti, podgotovlennoj v sootvetstvii s RSBU // My prodolzhaem tradicii rossijskoj statistiki: Materialy I Otkrytogo rossijskogo statisticheskogo kongressa (Novosibirsk, 20–22 oktjabrja 2015 goda). Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2015. P. 596–597.
6. Savel'eva M.Ju., Savel'eva Ju.V., Borodina Ju.B., Kuhta A.O. Ocenka otchetnosti kompanij jenergeticheskoj otrasli na predmet manipulirovanija pokazatelem pribyli // Sovremennye tendencii razvitija nauki i tehnologij: sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam IX Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii 31 dekabrja 2015 g. Belgorod, 2015. № 9-6. Ch.VI. P. 114–118.
7. Federal’nyj zakon RF «O vnesenii izmenenij v Kodeks RF ob administrativnyh pravonarushenijah» № 77-FZ ot 30.03.2016.
8. Beneish M.D. The Detection of Earnings Manipulation // Financial Analysts Journal. 1999. № 5 (September/ October).Vol. 55. P. 24–36.
9. Beneish M.D., Lee S., Nichols D.C. Earnings Manipulation and Expected Returns // Financial Analysts Journal. 2013. № 2 (March/ April).Vol. 69. P. 57–82.
10. Dechow P.M., Richardson S.A., Sloan R.G. The Persistence and Pricing of the Cash Component of Earnings // Journal of Accounting Research, June, 2008.
11. Healy P.M. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions // Journal of Accounting and Economics. 1985. № 7. P. 85–107.
12. Levitt A.The Nambers Game / NYU, Centre for Law and Business. 1998. P. 87.
13. Richardson S.A. at al. Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices // Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2005. № 3. P. 437–485.
14. Sloan R.G. Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future Earnings // Accounting Review. 1996.Vol. 71. № 3. P. 289–315.
15. Gordon E.A., Henry E., Jorgensen B.E., Lintchicum C.L. Flexibility in Cash Flow Reporting Classification Choices under IFRS / Working Paper Series, The University of Texas at San Antonio, March 2013. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://business.utsa. edu/wps/acc/0016ACC-006%20-2013.pdf (data obrashhenija: 11.03.2016).
16. Easton P.D., MacAnally M.L., Sommers G.A., Zhang H. Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation / Cambridge Business Publishers. 2015. C. 3–8. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://faculty.babson.edu/halsey/acc7500/DuPont%20analysis%20%96%20operating%20method.pdf (data obrashhenija: 11.03.2016).
17. PWC Rossijskij obzor jekonomicheskih prestuplenij «Na pravil'nom Puti». [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.pwc.ru/ru/ceo-survey/assets/crime_survey_2014.pdf (data obrashhenija: 11.03.2016).
18. Richardson S.A., Sloan R.G., Soliman M.T., Tuna I. Information in Accruals about the Quality of Earnings // Working Paper. University of Michigan, 2001. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.194.3047&rep=rep1&type=pdf (data obrashhenija: 11.03.2016).
19. Baza dannyh po rossijskim kompanijam, otrasljam i regionam. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.Skrin.ru (data obrashhenija: 07.04.2016).
Review
For citations:
Alekseev M.A., Savelyeva M.Yu. METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES OF GENERATION AND USE OF COEFFICIENTS OF ACCRUALS. Vestnik NSUEM. 2016;(2):139-155. (In Russ.)
Email this article 
