BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COST ESTIMATES BASED FRANCHISEE FRANCHISED AWARD
Abstract
The goal of the present paper is to evaluate the increase of value of franchisee’s business obtained thanks to its participation in the franchise network. It is demonstrated that this increase of value is based on the lower level of risks of franchisee in comparison with an independent businessman because franchising as an entrepreneurial tool allows to reduce commercial, marketing, financial and legal risks. The notion of franchise premium was introduced to denote this increase of value. A method of evaluation of this franshise premium is proposed. This method is based on analysis of discounted cash flows obtained by franchisee and an independent within three possible scenarios (pessimistic, most probable and optimistic). Main advantages and disadvantages of the proposed method are described.
About the Author
A. V. Patrusheva
System Ltd.
Russian Federation
Patrusheva Anna V., Accountant, Omsk
Russian Federation
Patrusheva Anna V., Accountant, Omsk
References
1. Valdajcev S.V. «Princip naibolee jeffektivnogo ispol’zovanija» i uchet riskov biznesa v uslovijah krizisa // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 5. Jekonomika. 2009. № 4. P. 128–136.
2. Kotljarov I.D. Matematicheskaja model’ prinjatija reshenija o priobretenii franshizy // Problemy upravlenija. 2007. № 5. P. 84–87.
3. Kotljarov I.D. Metafirma kak forma organizacii hozjajstvennoj dejatel’nosti // Upravlenie jekonomikoj: metody, modeli, tehnologii. Materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. V 2 t. T. 1. Ufimskij gosudarstvennyj aviacionnyj tehnicheskij universitet. Ufa, 2015. P. 88–91.
4. Kotljarov I.D. Opisanie finansovyh otnoshenij franchajzera i franchajzi // Kul’turologicheskij podhod v jekonomiko-pravovom razvitii regiona: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii XIV Makarkinskie nauchnye chtenija / otv. red. L.A. Kohanec; Mordov gumanitar. in-t. Saransk, 2014. P. 516–523. [Jelektronnyj resurs].
5. Kotljarov I.D. Opyt formal’nogo opisanija franchajzinga // Vestnik INZhJeKONa. Serija: Jekonomika. 2007. № 5. P. 129–133.
6. Kotljarov I.D. Uchet snizhenija riska pri ocenke intellektual’noj sobstvennosti // Problemy analiza riska. 2012. T. 9. № 1. P. 72–78.
7. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po ocenke jeffektivnosti investicionnyh proektov. Utverzhdeny Ministerstvom finansov i Ministerstvom jekonomicheskogo razvitija RF, a takzhe Gosstroem RF. 12.06.1999 (vtoraja versija).
8. Narkevich E.G. Franchajzing kak forma kooperacii: popytka analiza // Sovremennaja nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Serija: Jekonomika i pravo. 2012. № 4. P. 22–25.
9. Patrusheva A.V. Finansovye otnoshenija franchajzera i franchajzi // Finansovaja analitika: problemy i reshenija. 2016. № 21. P. 29–41.
10. Patrusheva A.V. Organizacionno-jekonomicheskaja priroda franchajzinga // Kompetentnost’. 2016. № 3. P. 42–46.
11. Timofeeva E.G. Jekonomicheskoe i organizacionnoe soderzhanie franchajzinga // Peterburgskij jekonomicheskij zhurnal. 2015. № 4. P. 145–153.
12. Blair Roger D., Lafontaine Francine. The Economics of Franchising. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 338 p.
13. Safan V., Escriba-Esteve A. Antecedents and consequences of external risk perception in franchising: evidence from the hospitality industry// Service business. 2011. № 3. P. 237–257.
Review
For citations:
Patrusheva A.V. BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COST ESTIMATES BASED FRANCHISEE FRANCHISED AWARD. Vestnik NSUEM. 2016;(4):294-300. (In Russ.)
Email this article 
